- Messages
- 143
- Reaction score
- 37
- Points
- 28
i used 2.83...Guys to calculate the resistance what did u use for V
We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)
i used 2.83...Guys to calculate the resistance what did u use for V
yes!!Exactly
Sorry not 17 i mean seven u might have used 3 but we had to use as 7 ms as the capacitor discharges in this much time i supposebut i used 13ms
i used 4 cuz it didnt ask for mean resistancei used 2.83...
werent we supposed to use the rms voltage???Sorry not 17 i mean seven u might have used 3 but we had to use as 7 ms as the capacitor discharges in this much time i suppose
I donot know ((but
werent we supposed to use the rms voltage???
it asked for average current, which means we had to use rms voltageI donot know ((
the ans for current was given if u got it ur right no matter how u did it ( if u used correct reasoning) btw to calculate current i used Q=It so i didnt need voltage !!!it asked for average current, which means we had to use rms voltage
thats what i did I=Q/tthe ans for current was given if u got it ur right no matter how u did it ( if u used correct reasoning) btw to calculate current i used Q=It so i didnt need voltage !!!
volume of molecules negligible compared to volume occupied by gas.all same xcept resistance was really confused in that part!!!
and yes the speed was around 5000
and the graph of Ek was like d.c bumps right with max Ek when displacement zero!!
and about the assumptions due to volume for ideal gases what did u write???
Ek graph is like a sine wave but all above the x-axis. Ek at zero displacement.all same xcept resistance was really confused in that part!!!
and yes the speed was around 5000
and the graph of Ek was like d.c bumps right with max Ek when displacement zero!!
and about the assumptions due to volume for ideal gases what did u write???
i knowww na, they are soo happy, look this means our variant is hard, cz if ones easy then the other is always hard, meaning hard paper, low GTs, do inshaAllah, we should all do goodit was an epic mass ****** i don't know about everybody but it's pretty much an epic fail for me :/
strange that people on the 42 thread are like dancing and so happy about how that variant was easy :S
exactly! I agree with you brother InshAllah, we will all get good grades!i knowww na, they are soo happy, look this means our variant is hard, cz if ones easy then the other is always hard, meaning hard paper, low GTs, do inshaAllah, we should all do good
im a girlexactly! I agree with you brother InshAllah, we will all get good grades!
sorry sisterim a girl
haha i forgive u
wasnt the power loss = 2.4 x10^-3 - 1996 = 404 ?aww well thats the only part im sure ill lose marks in!!
and yes rate of heat loss did the same time the loss was something in 3 digits per second i.e watt
graph same!!
For almost 10 years, the site XtremePapers has been trying very hard to serve its users.
However, we are now struggling to cover its operational costs due to unforeseen circumstances. If we helped you in any way, kindly contribute and be the part of this effort. No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
Click here to Donate Now