We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)
He "hav got senses". It was never mentioned in the paper that the mass of the raindrop decreases, hence you shouldn't assume so. Yes, the volume has decreased, but you have seen in the past papers, that water could have different densities, eg water vapour @ 1/1600 kgm^-3 and water @ 1000kgm^-3. This means that the mean separation between the molecules has decreased, but the mass has not decreased. Have you actually payed attention to the past papers you have done?hassam said:@gatechatl........if u hav got senses....which i dont think u hav....a samller drop will hav a smaller mass....ryt...?...so is it so hard to conceptualize....and u tell me wat assumption i made
Thank YOU. Someone who speaks sense. BTW there's no arguing here, just an aggressive debate :wink:akbararshad said:well radius was decreased so automatically d drag force reduced...... and acceleration increases..... wats here to fight abt guys??
well akbar....was ur terminal velocity lower for the sketch graph....akbararshad said:well radius was decreased so automatically d drag force reduced...... and acceleration increases..... wats here to fight abt guys??
I have not assumed that they have, but you were saying that it is impossible for mass to be the same. I used to information they gave, that the formula for resistive force is what it was. I am just explaining how it COULD be possible that densities were different. While doing the question, I only used the information they gave.hassam said:k i apologize for that..bt...who told u that two raindrops cn hav different densities...this is ur own assumption then...density only change when temp...is changing or state is changing,..u cnt get two drops with different density...and cud u plx post a link for the question in past papers u refrring to
Your making sense, but not in the context of this question. Good luck for any other exams you sit.hassam said:well akbar....was ur terminal velocity lower for the sketch graph....akbararshad said:well radius was decreased so automatically d drag force reduced...... and acceleration increases..... wats here to fight abt guys??
Yes it was.hassam said:guys...wat was ur a..was it 4.9.....?????
actually.. ur assuming too much.. they never gave us the mass.. they only gave the density.. Since density remains constant.. voume decrease results in mass decrease..Ismail Breiwish said:He "hav got senses". It was never mentioned in the paper that the mass of the raindrop decreases, hence you shouldn't assume so. Yes, the volume has decreased, but you have seen in the past papers, that water could have different densities, eg water vapour @ 1/1600 kgm^-3 and water @ 1000kgm^-3. This means that the mean separation between the molecules has decreased, but the mass has not decreased. Have you actually payed attention to the past papers you have done?hassam said:@gatechatl........if u hav got senses....which i dont think u hav....a samller drop will hav a smaller mass....ryt...?...so is it so hard to conceptualize....and u tell me wat assumption i made
yes u r..Hateexams93 said:AM I THE ONLY ONE WHO GOT 2.6 FOR THE CURRENT ?
BILALrox01 said:actually.. ur assuming too much.. they never gave us the mass.. they only gave the density.. Since density remains constant.. voume decrease results in mass decrease..Ismail Breiwish said:He "hav got senses". It was never mentioned in the paper that the mass of the raindrop decreases, hence you shouldn't assume so. Yes, the volume has decreased, but you have seen in the past papers, that water could have different densities, eg water vapour @ 1/1600 kgm^-3 and water @ 1000kgm^-3. This means that the mean separation between the molecules has decreased, but the mass has not decreased. Have you actually payed attention to the past papers you have done?hassam said:@gatechatl........if u hav got senses....which i dont think u hav....a samller drop will hav a smaller mass....ryt...?...so is it so hard to conceptualize....and u tell me wat assumption i made
ahsan99 said:Well both of your are working on assumptions. It said radius decreased
so surface area of the rain drop decreased too. Lesser resistance.
hence greater terminal velocity and more time taken to reach terminal velocity.
Simple. Both are in similar states hence density must be the same. hence mass of the second raindrop
should be more. Again whenever the mass is greater terminal velocity is more
since resultant downard force is more
Hope that clears
For almost 10 years, the site XtremePapers has been trying very hard to serve its users.
However, we are now struggling to cover its operational costs due to unforeseen circumstances. If we helped you in any way, kindly contribute and be the part of this effort. No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
Click here to Donate Now