• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

Physics: Post your doubts here!

Messages
15
Reaction score
7
Points
13
Help

A motorist travelling at 10 m/s
can bring his car to rest in a distance of 10 m.
If he had been travelling at 30 m/s
, in what distance could he bring the car to rest using the same
braking force?

I have no idea how to solve this... Plz help!



Tobi will help you solve it! :D
Alright
u = 10 m/s
v = 0 m/s
s = 10 m

That's the first case
So...
You gotta find the retardation of the car first [Basically negative acceleration]
So....
Yeah
* = Multiply

V*V = U*U - 2*a*s
0 = 100 - 20a
-100 = -20a
a = 100/20 =( 5m/s*s)

That's the acceleration of your car! CAR FTW ! XD

Now the question is IF he were to travel at 30m/s,what'd be the distance


Therefore use the same equation again nacho :D

But in this case:
u = 30 m/s
v = 0m/s
s = ??? m
a = 5 m/s*s


V*V = U*U - 2*a*s
0 = 30*30 - 2*5*s
0 = 900 - 10s
- 900 = -10s
s = -900/-10 = 90m

90m OMG. That's the answer lol xD


btw doesn't a motorist drive a motorcycle instead of a car?How can a biker drive a car at the same time when he's driving a bike?:/
 
Messages
97
Reaction score
23
Points
8
Messages
97
Reaction score
23
Points
8
2(D) Use s=ut + 1/2 at^2. Sub in time from c(ii) and acceleration from c(i). Your answer should be s=12.71cm. But the length of the metal plates is only 12cm. Since s calculated is longer than metal plates, electron will emerge from plates.

5(c) I'm not so sure. My answer for you would be from the marking scheme so if you're looking for explanation, it wouldn't be helpful..
 
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Points
1
Hi everyone :)
Can anyone help me find a website where I can find classified pastpapers ??
 
Messages
97
Reaction score
23
Points
8
Can anyone help clarify? For Q4, why is the answer D not B? For Q10, Why is it not A but D? Thanks!! :)
 

Attachments

  • Doc.docx
    71.1 KB · Views: 4
Messages
2
Reaction score
3
Points
3
Does anyone has an idea about the physics practical where we don't have to draw any graph?
 
Messages
204
Reaction score
81
Points
38
Can anyone help clarify? For Q4, why is the answer D not B? For Q10, Why is it not A but D? Thanks!! :)
For Q no. 4 the total range with which the values are fluctuating is +- 0.04 not +- 0.02 . So the range is +- 0.04. That's my reason . And for question no. 10 we know that in case of elastic collision u1 - u2 = v2 - v1 ( i.e Speed of approach = Speed of separation ) . Since the body are initially travelling in opposite direction so one velocity must be in negative direction. Since u1, v1 and v2 are in same direction so it is better to take u2 as negative ( But you can alter that and take u2 as positive and others as negative. You will end up with the same answer in either case. ) Now since u2 is negative so the above eqn. becomes (u1 + u2 = v2 - v1 ) So D not A. I guess you are clear now. (y)
 
Messages
204
Reaction score
81
Points
38
Does anyone has an idea about the physics practical where we don't have to draw any graph?
Yes for the question no. 2 of Paper 3 . You have to write the errors and ways to solve them and you usually don't have to draw graph in those questions.
 
Messages
97
Reaction score
23
Points
8
For Q no. 4 the total range with which the values are fluctuating is +- 0.04 not +- 0.02 . So the range is +- 0.04. That's my reason . And for question no. 10 we know that in case of elastic collision u1 - u2 = v2 - v1 ( i.e Speed of approach = Speed of separation ) . Since the body are initially travelling in opposite direction so one velocity must be in negative direction. Since u1, v1 and v2 are in same direction so it is better to take u2 as negative ( But you can alter that and take u2 as positive and others as negative. You will end up with the same answer in either case. ) Now since u2 is negative so the above eqn. becomes (u1 + u2 = v2 - v1 ) So D not A. I guess you are clear now. (y)
Thank you soo much :D
 
Messages
97
Reaction score
23
Points
8
For Q no. 4 the total range with which the values are fluctuating is +- 0.04 not +- 0.02 . So the range is +- 0.04. That's my reason . And for question no. 10 we know that in case of elastic collision u1 - u2 = v2 - v1 ( i.e Speed of approach = Speed of separation ) . Since the body are initially travelling in opposite direction so one velocity must be in negative direction. Since u1, v1 and v2 are in same direction so it is better to take u2 as negative ( But you can alter that and take u2 as positive and others as negative. You will end up with the same answer in either case. ) Now since u2 is negative so the above eqn. becomes (u1 + u2 = v2 - v1 ) So D not A. I guess you are clear now. (y)

Oh, I forgot to ask. For speed of approach=speed of separation, the formula is u1-u2 = v2-v1 right? As you showed previously.. So I can't use m1u1 + m2u2 = m1v1 + m2v2 ?
 
Messages
49
Reaction score
13
Points
8
Tobi will help you solve it! :D
Alright
u = 10 m/s
v = 0 m/s
s = 10 m

That's the first case
So...
You gotta find the retardation of the car first [Basically negative acceleration]
So....
Yeah
* = Multiply

V*V = U*U - 2*a*s
0 = 100 - 20a
-100 = -20a
a = 100/20 =( 5m/s*s)

That's the acceleration of your car! CAR FTW ! XD

Now the question is IF he were to travel at 30m/s,what'd be the distance


Therefore use the same equation again nacho :D

But in this case:
u = 30 m/s
v = 0m/s
s = ??? m
a = 5 m/s*s


V*V = U*U - 2*a*s
0 = 30*30 - 2*5*s
0 = 900 - 10s
- 900 = -10s
s = -900/-10 = 90m

90m OMG. That's the answer lol xD


btw doesn't a motorist drive a motorcycle instead of a car?How can a biker drive a car at the same time when he's driving a bike?:/
haha, no the motorist drives a vehicle powered by a motor,here, a car:)
 
Messages
204
Reaction score
81
Points
38
Oh, I forgot to ask. For speed of approach=speed of separation, the formula is u1-u2 = v2-v1 right? As you showed previously.. So I can't use m1u1 + m2u2 = m1v1 + m2v2 ?
Its not for elastic collision. That's for inelastic collision. In case of elastic collision the kinetic energy of the body is conserved so we have to use the another equation that I mentioned earlier. I guess you are clear now. :)
 
Messages
197
Reaction score
423
Points
73
For Q1, cube root 2.7 x 10 ^ 25 m ^-3 and you get 6.46 x 10^-9 m. Divide the answer by two again and you get the final answer. I don't know why divide by two though...
For Q2, use P1/T1 =P2/T2 to get the pressure when box is 200 degree celsius. Remember that temp should be in Kelvin. You should get 1.65 x 10^ 5 Pa. Since it says net force, find its net pressure. Outside the box there's atmospheric pressure of 1.01 x 10^5 Pa already. Inside the box, there's 1.65 x 10^5 Pa. So minus that and you get 6.5 x 10^4 Pa. That times the area which is 0.09m squared, you'll get the final answer :)

Heyyyyy!! Thanks loads ! :)
 
Messages
197
Reaction score
423
Points
73

Resolve v :
1. You get v cos theta along X . So magnitude of X = v cos theta
But using mathematical knowledge :
Increasing theta form 0 to 90 degrees causes cos theta to decrease . Remember the graph for cos theta ? Do refer to it.
Hence along X , v cos theta decreases, so X decreases.

2. You get v sin theta along Y .So magnitude of Y = v sin theta .
But again applying mathematics:
Increasing theta from 0 to 90 degrees causes sin theta to increase . Refer graph of sin theta .
Hence Y increases.

Hope it helped!
 
Top