• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

Physics: Post your doubts here!

Messages
1,394
Reaction score
1,377
Points
173
q4 c) for lower frequency we need a longer wavelength as the speed of sound is constant 330 ms^-1 so the longest wavelength will be 4*45cm =1.8m because large sound is only produced when anti node is formed at the open end of the tube. so the longest wavelength will causes by the fundamental frequency
y cant the wavelength b larger than that?
 
Messages
140
Reaction score
61
Points
38
y cant the wavelength b larger than that?
if u will take a larger wave length u can achieve the loud sound but the frequency will be higher therefore u take the long wave length t achieve a low frequency they are lambda is inversely proportional to the frequency......
 
Messages
1,824
Reaction score
949
Points
123

From question.

"At point P on the screen, the path difference is zero for light arriving at P from the slits A
and B."

Meaning destructive interference.. So Phase Difference at P is 180 Degrees.

2. Wave A Amplitude 2.. Wave B amplitude 1.4..

Ratio of intensity of light at a bright fringe and intensity of light at a dark fringe ...

At Bright Fringe .. The waves will be in phase and there will be constructive interference (Amplitudes will get added) while at Dark Fringe the waves will be out of phase and there will be destructive interference (Amplitude will be subtracted from each other)

So at Bright A= 2 + 1.4 = 3.4 And at Dark A= 2-1.4 = 0.6

I is directly propotional to A^2 .. so

Ratio of Intensity at bright to dark will be (3.4^2)/(0.6^2) = 32:1 Answer
 
Messages
415
Reaction score
252
Points
53
From question.

"At point P on the screen, the path difference is zero for light arriving at P from the slits A
and B."

Meaning destructive interference.. So Phase Difference at P is 180 Degrees.

2. Wave A Amplitude 2.. Wave B amplitude 1.4..

Ratio of intensity of light at a bright fringe and intensity of light at a dark fringe ...

At Bright Fringe .. The waves will be in phase and there will be constructive interference (Amplitudes will get added) while at Dark Fringe the waves will be out of phase and there will be destructive interference (Amplitude will be subtracted from each other)

So at Bright A= 2 + 1.4 = 3.4 And at Dark A= 2-1.4 = 0.6

I is directly propotional to A^2 .. so

Ratio of Intensity at bright to dark will be (3.4^2)/(0.6^2) = 32:1 Answer

thanks ... but i got it after trying ...;)
 
Messages
6,440
Reaction score
31,077
Points
698
please help me with question number 10(c) how to draw the graph. link to the question is http://papers.xtremepapers.com/CIE/Cambridge International A and AS Level/Physics (9702)/9702_w07_qp_4.pdf


i have doubt in this question i have drawn the graph below and i think thiere is some mistake in this can some one please check and if theres a mistake rectify it please
http://papers.xtremepapers.com/CIE/Cambridge International A and AS Level/Physics (9702)/9702_w07_qp_4.pdf
question number-10(c)
and my attached solved
 

Attachments

  • physics amplitude modillation doubt.jpg
    physics amplitude modillation doubt.jpg
    55.6 KB · Views: 13
Messages
1,394
Reaction score
1,377
Points
173
if u will take a larger wave length u can achieve the loud sound but the frequency will be higher therefore u take the long wave length t achieve a low frequency they are lambda is inversely proportional to the frequency......
why would the frequency b higher?? isn't frequency always smaller with a longer wavelenth?
 

Tkp

Messages
1,660
Reaction score
11,026
Points
523
y cant the wavelength b larger than that?
hw come the wavelength can be larger than that?c an antinode is formed at the open end and at the closed end node is formed.so the distance between adjacent nodes and antinodes is 0.25lambda
so .25 lambda =.45
so lambda =1.8
so 330/1.8 and u will get the ans
 
Messages
1,394
Reaction score
1,377
Points
173
hw come the wavelength can be larger than that?c an antinode is formed at the open end and at the closed end node is formed.so the distance between adjacent nodes and antinodes is 0.25lambda
so .25 lambda =.45
so lambda =1.8
so 330/1.8 and u will get the ans
oohhh ryt!! -_- Gosh!! this physics is really starting to get to me now -_- thanks btw :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tkp
Messages
958
Reaction score
3,499
Points
253
Messages
1,394
Reaction score
1,377
Points
173
I have 2 variants of the mayy/june 2009 paper 2 o_O but in the past papers section of xtremepapers.com there is only a single variant....
i wanted to ask questions from variant 22 if anyone can answer them for me plz do.... sorry i can't post the link bcz i have it in hard copy: -
M/J 2009 p22
Q6b(ii) Why can't we do it with v=s/t ??
Q2 (whole of it please explain every part.... i got the whole question wrong :O )
Thanks in advance
PlanetMaster can u help me?? I was recommended :p
 
Messages
1,824
Reaction score
949
Points
123
I have 2 variants of the mayy/june 2009 paper 2 o_O but in the past papers section of xtremepapers.com there is only a single variant....
i wanted to ask questions from variant 22 if anyone can answer them for me plz do.... sorry i can't post the link bcz i have it in hard copy: -
M/J 2009 p22
Q6b(ii) Why can't we do it with v=s/t ??
Q2 (whole of it please explain every part.... i got the whole question wrong :O )
Thanks in advance
PlanetMaster can u help me?? I was recommended :p

http://papers.xtremepapers.com/CIE/Cambridge International A and AS Level/Physics (9702)/9702_s09_qp_2.pdf

Both Variants are present... just scroll down and you will find the variant 22 paper :p

Q 6 b ii) We only use v = d/t only when velocity is constant and acceleration is 0.

the part i.. shows that the acceleration is not zero so velocity can't be constant.. so can't use that fomula.. we will have to use s = ut + 1/2 at^2

since intial speed is zero .. formula becomes s = 1/2 at^2

Q2.. Well even I am not that good in physics to be able to solve this one :p All I can do is that the time at which it reaches max height is when v = 0 .. so t = 2.4s
 
Top