can you plaese explain in details
c)i and c)ii
http://papers.xtremepapers.com/CIE/...nd AS Level/Physics (9702)/9702_w10_qp_22.pdf
c)i and c)ii
http://papers.xtremepapers.com/CIE/...nd AS Level/Physics (9702)/9702_w10_qp_22.pdf
We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)
can you plaese explain in details
c)i and c)ii
http://papers.xtremepapers.com/CIE/Cambridge International A and AS Level/Physics (9702)/9702_w10_qp_22.pdf
View attachment 24641
woww i explained that question too earlier today but my exlanation seeems like layman language and kindergarten stuff when compared to urs ... hats off man #RESPECT!! O__Oci)Two other forces would be-
1) the normal reaction force, which acts upwards from the rod.
2) Friction between the rod and the card as the card swings.
cii) the card comes to rest when it's center of gravity is directly along the vertical axis through the rod. This is because at this position the weight does not create any moment about the rod. No resultant moment so the card rests.
yeah i did thanks a bunch I got it now... i was doing with the drawing the waves method and reading the answer i realized i was going about it all wrong and caught my mistakeOkaaay, I will.
Did you get the answer for your problem?
THANKSci)Two other forces would be-
1) the normal reaction force, which acts upwards from the rod.
2) Friction between the rod and the card as the card swings.
cii) the card comes to rest when it's center of gravity is directly along the vertical axis through the rod. This is because at this position the weight does not create any moment about the rod. No resultant moment so the card rests.
woaaahhh the first thing i noticed was the number of tabs on the browser in ur pic!! O__OTHANKS
GOOD EXPLANATION
WOULD YOU PLAESE EXPLAIN THIS
http://papers.xtremepapers.com/CIE/...nd AS Level/Physics (9702)/9702_w10_qp_23.pdf CAN YOU PLAESE EXPLAIN WITH IN DETAILS GTHIS QUESTIONView attachment 24643
THANKS
GOOD EXPLANATION
WOULD YOU PLAESE EXPLAIN THIS
http://papers.xtremepapers.com/CIE/...nd AS Level/Physics (9702)/9702_w10_qp_23.pdf CAN YOU PLAESE EXPLAIN WITH IN DETAILS GTHIS QUESTIONView attachment 24643
woww i explained that question too earlier today but my exlanation seeems like layman language and kindergarten stuff when compared to urs ... hats off man #RESPECT!! O__O
your explanation are very good thank you very much you are very helpfulFirst you connect the output of the loudspeaker to the c.r.o. This is done by connecting the microphone detecting the output to the y-plates of the c.r.o
You can notice a dot move across the screen. Next you can adjust the time-base setting of the c.r.o until you can see a few cycles of the wave. The time base allows you to measure the time period for the wave. Frequency = 1/time period
http://papers.xtremepapers.com/CIE/Cambridge International A and AS Level/Physics (9702)/9702_s11_qp_42.pdf
Question 9b (ii) and (iii)
Can someone please explain this to me? I don't understand this at all.
Thank you very much.
Thank you so much. gary2219 b ii) Since the Vout is the difference btw the two input voltages... Vout will only be zero when both V+ n V- are the same ie V+ = V- ---> V2 = V1
n to calculate the value of V2 (which is in a potential divider circuit), the formula ---> V2 = [R1/(R1 + R2)] * Vtotal.
So, V2 = [1000/(1000 + 125)] * 4.5
V2 = V1 = 4.0 V
iii) V1 = 4.0 V
V2 = [R1/(R1 + R2)] * Vtotal
= [1000/1128] * 4.5
= 3.99 V
Vin = V2 - V1 = 3.99 - 4 = -0.01 V
So, gain = 12 = Vout/Vin
12 = Vout/(-0.01)
Vout = 12 * 0.01
Vout = -0.12 V
I'm sorry i can't make the graph here but wat u need to do is make a line with a positive gradient first and after it reches the maximum velocity the line bends with a very negative gradient (remember this is rebound of the ball and the time for that is 20ms only) then the graph bends again and another straight line is made again with a positive gradient but it is in the negative area of the graph i.e. below the x-axis. Remember this second area under graph (distance) should be less than the one before because the ball attains a lesser height this time.Asalam-o-Alaikum!
can anyone please
explain http://papers.xtremepapers.com/CIE/Cambridge International A and AS Level/Physics (9702)/9702_s12_qp_22.pdf question 2, part b & ci?
gary221
thanks a bunch!
I think it should be mv-muAsalam-o-Alaikum once again..!
http://papers.xtremepapers.com/CIE/Cambridge International A and AS Level/Physics (9702)/9702_w11_qp_21.pdf
Question 3ci.. when they ask us to calculate change in momentum...is it like mv - mu or mu - mv ?
thanks a bunch..!
yup mv-muI think it should be mv-mu
For almost 10 years, the site XtremePapers has been trying very hard to serve its users.
However, we are now struggling to cover its operational costs due to unforeseen circumstances. If we helped you in any way, kindly contribute and be the part of this effort. No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
Click here to Donate Now