• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

Physics: Post your doubts here!

Messages
844
Reaction score
2,495
Points
253

ci)Two other forces would be-
1) the normal reaction force, which acts upwards from the rod.
2) Friction between the rod and the card as the card swings.

cii) the card comes to rest when it's center of gravity is directly along the vertical axis through the rod. This is because at this position the weight does not create any moment about the rod. No resultant moment so the card rests.
 
Messages
1,394
Reaction score
1,377
Points
173
ci)Two other forces would be-
1) the normal reaction force, which acts upwards from the rod.
2) Friction between the rod and the card as the card swings.

cii) the card comes to rest when it's center of gravity is directly along the vertical axis through the rod. This is because at this position the weight does not create any moment about the rod. No resultant moment so the card rests.
woww i explained that question too earlier today but my exlanation seeems like layman language and kindergarten stuff when compared to urs ... hats off man #RESPECT!! O__O :D
 
Messages
1,394
Reaction score
1,377
Points
173
Okaaay, I will. :)
Did you get the answer for your problem?
yeah i did thanks a bunch :) I got it now... i was doing with the drawing the waves method and reading the answer i realized i was going about it all wrong and caught my mistake :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: asd
Messages
355
Reaction score
95
Points
38
ci)Two other forces would be-
1) the normal reaction force, which acts upwards from the rod.
2) Friction between the rod and the card as the card swings.

cii) the card comes to rest when it's center of gravity is directly along the vertical axis through the rod. This is because at this position the weight does not create any moment about the rod. No resultant moment so the card rests.
THANKS
GOOD EXPLANATION
WOULD YOU PLAESE EXPLAIN THIS
http://papers.xtremepapers.com/CIE/...nd AS Level/Physics (9702)/9702_w10_qp_23.pdf CAN YOU PLAESE EXPLAIN WITH IN DETAILS GTHIS QUESTIONUntitled.png
 
Messages
844
Reaction score
2,495
Points
253
THANKS
GOOD EXPLANATION
WOULD YOU PLAESE EXPLAIN THIS
http://papers.xtremepapers.com/CIE/...nd AS Level/Physics (9702)/9702_w10_qp_23.pdf CAN YOU PLAESE EXPLAIN WITH IN DETAILS GTHIS QUESTIONView attachment 24643

First you connect the output of the loudspeaker to the c.r.o. This is done by connecting the microphone detecting the output to the y-plates of the c.r.o
You can notice a dot move across the screen. Next you can adjust the time-base setting of the c.r.o until you can see a few cycles of the wave. The time base allows you to measure the time period for the wave. Frequency = 1/time period
 
Messages
355
Reaction score
95
Points
38
First you connect the output of the loudspeaker to the c.r.o. This is done by connecting the microphone detecting the output to the y-plates of the c.r.o
You can notice a dot move across the screen. Next you can adjust the time-base setting of the c.r.o until you can see a few cycles of the wave. The time base allows you to measure the time period for the wave. Frequency = 1/time period
your explanation are very good thank you very much you are very helpful
 
Messages
6,440
Reaction score
31,077
Points
698
http://papers.xtremepapers.com/CIE/Cambridge International A and AS Level/Physics (9702)/9702_s11_qp_42.pdf
Question 9b (ii) and (iii)
Can someone please explain this to me? I don't understand this at all.
Thank you very much.

9 b ii) Since the Vout is the difference btw the two input voltages... Vout will only be zero when both V+ n V- are the same ie V+ = V- ---> V2 = V1
n to calculate the value of V2 (which is in a potential divider circuit), the formula ---> V2 = [R1/(R1 + R2)] * Vtotal.
So, V2 = [1000/(1000 + 125)] * 4.5
V2 = V1 = 4.0 V

iii) V1 = 4.0 V
V2 = [R1/(R1 + R2)] * Vtotal
= [1000/1128] * 4.5
= 3.99 V
Vin = V2 - V1 = 3.99 - 4 = -0.01 V
So, gain = 12 = Vout/Vin
12 = Vout/(-0.01)
Vout = 12 * 0.01
Vout = -0.12 V
 
Messages
373
Reaction score
1,091
Points
153
9 b ii) Since the Vout is the difference btw the two input voltages... Vout will only be zero when both V+ n V- are the same ie V+ = V- ---> V2 = V1
n to calculate the value of V2 (which is in a potential divider circuit), the formula ---> V2 = [R1/(R1 + R2)] * Vtotal.
So, V2 = [1000/(1000 + 125)] * 4.5
V2 = V1 = 4.0 V

iii) V1 = 4.0 V
V2 = [R1/(R1 + R2)] * Vtotal
= [1000/1128] * 4.5
= 3.99 V
Vin = V2 - V1 = 3.99 - 4 = -0.01 V
So, gain = 12 = Vout/Vin
12 = Vout/(-0.01)
Vout = 12 * 0.01
Vout = -0.12 V
Thank you so much. gary221
I get it now. That was brilliant. (y)
 
Messages
1,394
Reaction score
1,377
Points
173
Asalam-o-Alaikum!
can anyone please
explain http://papers.xtremepapers.com/CIE/Cambridge International A and AS Level/Physics (9702)/9702_s12_qp_22.pdf question 2, part b & ci?
gary221
thanks a bunch! :)
I'm sorry i can't make the graph here but wat u need to do is make a line with a positive gradient first and after it reches the maximum velocity the line bends with a very negative gradient (remember this is rebound of the ball and the time for that is 20ms only) then the graph bends again and another straight line is made again with a positive gradient but it is in the negative area of the graph i.e. below the x-axis. Remember this second area under graph (distance) should be less than the one before because the ball attains a lesser height this time.

in ci u need to calculate the two kinetic energies and find their difference...
u have the velocity of the ball at A so calculate the kinetic energy at that point with Ek=(1/2)mv^2
use the velocity of the ball at B to calculate the Ek at B and find the difference of the two values...
if i am wrong or u don't get what i did then plz do tell :)
 
Top