• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

Physics: Post your doubts here!

Messages
420
Reaction score
1,426
Points
153
Yeah that too! but more significant number means less uncertainty...so 3 sf is much reliable. im talking about paper 4 here.
For paper 5, you're right!:)
no no, I'm talking about ppr 2 and all. for eg: if you are required to find the force and you are given m=5.0kg and a=1.2 m s^-2 then wont force=ma=6.0 N and not 6.00N?
 
Messages
88
Reaction score
212
Points
43
Messages
88
Reaction score
212
Points
43
could someone tell me whats a traveling microscope ? and where do we use it? since they keep mentioning about it in physics paper 3 (in improvements)in mark schemes
 
Messages
4,162
Reaction score
1,119
Points
173
Messages
382
Reaction score
315
Points
73
Just measure the area of the 1x1 square that u can form it comes out to be
1.25*0.125=0.15625mC = 156.25microC =156microC

This is just the area of one such box so multiply it with the no. of 1 x 1 squares below line to get answer !
How did you get 1.25 and 0.125? Sorry for bothering :/
 
Messages
264
Reaction score
395
Points
73
Anyone can explain Q9 (all) please?
 

Attachments

  • 9702_s09_qp_4.pdf
    160.6 KB · Views: 13
  • 9702_s09_ms_4.pdf
    94.5 KB · Views: 2
Messages
4,162
Reaction score
1,119
Points
173
How did you get 1.25 and 0.125? Sorry for bothering :/

You really need the paper in its exact form and dimensions so that u can see the number of small blocks that are present in 1 cm so i actually enlarged the paper to the size we normally have and then used a scale to see what 1cm is. Dont worry in exam this will be easy.
 
Messages
306
Reaction score
278
Points
38
I'm assuming that you got the answers for the previous two parts.. for part (iii),
Intensity received back= (intensity reflected at the muscle-bone boundary)e^-(23 * 4.1 * 10^-2)

[ e^-(23 * 4.1 * 10^-2) = 0.39]


intensity of the wave incident on the boundary was 0.39I, as calculated in part (ii)
0.33 of this was reflected at the boundary.
So intensity reflected at the muscle-bone boundary= .39 * .33I

answer= .39 * .33I * .39 = .050I

I hope this helps
why you multiplied 0.39 twice ? :O
 
Top