- Messages
- 129
- Reaction score
- 306
- Points
- 73
What to explain in this yaar ?
Its C simple theory question, for which you need to read chapters, see my signature !!!!
Okay, ignore that question.
Can you help me with question 19 though? Same paper.
We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)
What to explain in this yaar ?
Its C simple theory question, for which you need to read chapters, see my signature !!!!
I said that's my doubt ._.Okay, ignore that question.
Can you help me with question 19 though? Same paper.
16)
I said that's my doubt ._.
Who taught you.I understand it now. The mass of the model is 10 times smaller in each direction. So if the mass of the actual crane is 1000 kg, the mass of the model will be 10 kg. The young's modulus is the same in either case. We just have to solve for the extensions and then find the ratio. Simple as pie.
"On reading the question again, there is something crazily interesting there - they have clearly mentioned that the load is cubic. Why? WHY?Wow, is this a good question! The trick here is to simply work through all the steps, and see what you get.
First step is in find the extension from the values we know.
The Young's Modulus Formula is
Y = Fl/Ae (where F is the tension, l is the original, unladen length of the sample, e is the extension, and A is the cross section perpendicular to the extension)
So, by multiplying both sides by e, we get
eY = Fl/A From here, suppose we divide both sides by Y, we get
e = Fl/AY which is the extension formula that we need. What we need to do is find out the values of this ratio for both the scale model and the full size version, and divide them to get the final answer.
A very important point to note here is that the question says that all linear dimensions are in a ratio of 1:10; this means that quantities such as length, radius, diameter, height, and so on are 10 times greater in the real version than in the scale model. Quantities such as Area, Volume, and Density are non-linear and so do not follow this ratio.
On reading the question again, there is something crazily interesting there - they have clearly mentioned that the load is cubic. Why? WHY?
It's important, that's why:
Suppose the material has some density ρ and it has a side length a. Then, for the scale model, the mass = ρV = ρa^3.
For the full size model, the same follows - however, the length has increased to 10 * a, so the mass of the load in the full-size crane = ρ(10a)^3 = 1000ρa.
Major importance there!
I'm pretty sure there is no more to be taken in consideration, since the extension of a wire requires you to consider only the dimension of the wire (going to do it), the load (done by above discussion) and the kind of material being stretched (Young's Modulus is the same since the material used is the same. Done!)
So, for the scale model:
i) The force can be written as "F" (let's say). This is also equal to ρa^3, as discussed above.
ii) The length of the cable without any strain applied can be written as "l".
iii) The Cross Sectional Area of the wire should be written as πr^2, where r is the radius of the cable.
iv) Finally, the Young Modulus can just be written as "Y".
Therefore, we can write
(extension of cable on the model crane) = [(ρa^3)gl]/Yπr^2
For the real crane:
i) The force can be written as "1000ρa^3", again as discussed above.
ii) The length of the cable without any strain can be written as "L". We know from the question that this is equal to 10 * l, so the length = "10l".
iii) The Cross Sectional Area of the wire should be written as "πR^2" where R is the radius of the full scale wire. We know this is equal to 10*r, so we can write that
the cross-sectional area of the real cable = π * (10r)^2 = 100πr^2.
iv) Again, the Young Modulus is just Y, since the material of the real cable is the same as the material of the scale model cable.
Therefore, we can write
(extension of cable on the full-size crane) = [(1000ρa^3 ) * 10l]/[100Yπr^2] = [(100ρa^3)gl]/Yπr^2
Dividing those two, we get (extension of cable on the full-size crane)/(extension of cable on the model crane) = 100 = 10^2 = C.
Hope this helped!
Good Luck for all your exams!
Who taught you.
Still Where are the calculations man!![]()
Now this is how I got it from sagar! And I will remember this way only. Thanks palAssume the young's modulus is 1 and then arrange the equation so that the extension is on one side and everything else is on the other side. Then just assume values for F, the original length, x, and area, A. Then find the extension. This will be the extension for the crane. Do the same for the model using values that are ten times less than the values used before, but F should be 10 times less in each direction. So if F was 1000 before, now it's 10. If x was 10 before, now it's 1. If Area was 1 before, the radius must've been one, so now the radius should be 0.1 and then the area could be assumed to be 0.1^2. Then solve for the extension of the model. This is what I did and I'm getting a ratio of 100, which is the correct answer.
could u plz explain me how to write the answer of the question about the justification of significant figures in q-2 0f p-3.
like the one in o/n10 variant 33 q-2 g(ii)
& the one in m/j 08 q--2c(iv)
Can anyone help me?
M/J/13- (12) -3,9,19,20,23,27
M/J/13-(11) - 8,11,17,18,19
M/J/13-(13)- 10,15,16,27
7)
Acceleration upwards is always -9.81 and downwards 9.81. As upward motion is positive, + multiplied ny - gives you -9.81. Vice versa with downward motion. - multiplied with +9.81. The magnitude stays the same as long as air resistance is neglected, and the sign depends on which direction you take as positive.
9)
initial momentum of the ball is 2mv before collision... if collision was perfectly elastic one, all the momentum would have been gained by the ball... and this would have made the change in the momentum equal to 4mv.. 2mv-(-2mv)... now it is given that collision is inelastic, it will lose some of its momentum to the wall.. so now change in momentum will be less than 4mv but cant be less than the initial momentum... so the answer is C.
22)
because since k is low for the first spring, the box will prevent it from breaking by over extending. Hence A
26)
We know that distance between two minima is given by λ/2 (example, distance b/w T and S is λ/2)
We also know that Microwave travels with the speed of light c i.e is 3 * 10^8 m/s
Given distance b/w each minima is 15 mm so total distance from T to P would be 15 * 4 = 60 mm
Now distance b/w:
T and S = λ/2,
S and R = λ/2
R and Q = λ/2
Q and P = λ/2
and them you get 2λ
so 2λ = 60*10^-3
hence λ = 0.03 m
We know that c = f * λ
So f = c / λ
f = ( 3 * 10^8 ) / ( 0.03 )
f=10GHz
27)
Let the distance between the double slit and the screen be 1m initally.
When the distance is increasd BY 2m the NEW distance is 3m.
Using the formula:
Wavelength= (fringe seperationx distance between the double slits)/ distance between the screen and the slits.
Wavelenght=600nm=600x10^-9m.
Fringe seperation= 3mm= 3x10^-3m
Distance between screen and slits= 3m (1+2)
Distance between the double slit=?
Put these values in the formula, the final answer is 6x10^-4m =0.6mm
Hence the answer is B.
34)
voltage decreases linearly so its supposed to be B : as rho increases, there would be more steepness in graph
http://papers.xtremepapers.com/CIE/Cambridge International A and AS Level/Physics (9702)/9702_w11_qp_12.pdf
questions 10,17,23,26,35 please!
For almost 10 years, the site XtremePapers has been trying very hard to serve its users.
However, we are now struggling to cover its operational costs due to unforeseen circumstances. If we helped you in any way, kindly contribute and be the part of this effort. No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
Click here to Donate Now