We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)
Since it is transverse wave, the speed same throughout and displacement varies.The option C about K.E is purely rubbish. While the option D is correct because it is a fact.how?..plx explain..
I had solve this question, go few pages back or gimme paper linkhewlp
Actually the particle is changing its direction. Thus, from moving downwards to moving upwards, there is a change in direction. I am not sure about the speed here, but the acceleration would be high due to the change in direction, as acceleration has both magnitude and directionSince it is transverse wave, the speed same throughout and displacement varies.The option C about K.E is purely rubbish. While the option D is correct because it is a fact.
29)http://papers.xtremepapers.com/CIE/...nd AS Level/Physics (9702)/9702_s12_qp_12.pdf
questions 29,34,36,37,38,39 please!
9)
http://papers.xtremepapers.com/CIE/...and AS Level/Physics (9702)/9702_s07_qp_1.pdfI had solve this question, go few pages back or gimme paper link
V1= 5000/ (5000+5000) x 2 = 1V then V2= 3000/ (3000 + 2000) x 2 = 1.2 so V1 - V2 = -0.2 so C
i'm sooo sooo sorry i pasted the wrong link x_x i it was supposed to be w12 not s12 ugh!29)
c = f * λ
We know f = 1 / t
so c = 1 / t * λ
t = λ / c
now it took 3 wavefronts to reach XY to P
so t = 3λ / c
34)
View attachment 44703
36)
Its obviously D :
As Light intensity increases, its resistace decreases, so as R = V / I , R α V, so As R decreases, V would also decrease across LDR.
37)
current is passing through both lamps so they will glow dimly. dimly because the current will be less as now there are two compared to one light bulbs.
38)
What's hard in this ?
Find resistance in each case
3 would be highest with 0.7Ω
and 1 would be least with 0.4Ω
39)
Theory part maat pucho, chapter parho and then na aye to phucho
thnk uV1= 5000/ (5000+5000) x 2 = 1V then V2= 3000/ (3000 + 2000) x 2 = 1.2 so V1 - V2 = -0.2 so C
Simple as this:Hey. In physics paper 3 (practical), how do I prove whether a mathematical relationship is supported or not by calculating two values of k? Can anybody help me out here?
Simple as this:
1)You are asked to find out the %uncertainty of(say x) in the one of the question
2)you are also asked to find two values of k (k1 and k2) in one of the question
Now,
suppose you got %uncertainty of x as 20%. Then you find k1+ 20% of k1 AND k1-20% of k1
This is the range
If your value of k2(found in 2) matches it, THE RELATION IS SATISFIED
in most of the questions, it is satisfied.
I hope this helped!
Good luck. Light and luck bless you!
For almost 10 years, the site XtremePapers has been trying very hard to serve its users.
However, we are now struggling to cover its operational costs due to unforeseen circumstances. If we helped you in any way, kindly contribute and be the part of this effort. No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
Click here to Donate Now