We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)
ryt,,,thns a lotk= gradient
(convert the mm into metre)
k=12/0.06
k=200
right??
use
the formula d1/d2=h2/h1
hq/hp=2/3
but why dd u divide 12 by 0.06..why not 8/0.06k= gradient
(convert the mm into metre)
k=12/0.06
k=200
right??
10)june 2003 please explain numbers :
10
11
13
19
20
22
28
29
35 why not b
36?????
ss the ans is it A...wteva////same formula is used....jst look at the height of the column and apply itThat's the wrong answer
K = F / x
OOOOOOOOoooo....im in a state of PHD...'phira hua dimagh'K = F / x
K = 12 / 0.06 = 200 N/m
http://papers.xtremepapers.com/CIE/Cambridge International A and AS Level/Physics (9702)/9702_s13_qp_12.pdf 23 isn't the area increased by 100 and the force by 10 so won't that make 1/10:1 instead of 10:1?
I can see itO
OOOOOOOOoooo....im in a state of PHD...'phira hua dimagh'
To pan nathi thatuUse the concept of relative speed of approach = relative speed of separation
ok mane time app... hu lakhine moklu..To pan nathi thatu
if you want to use 8 , then you would have to use 0.04 ...but why dd u divide 12 by 0.06..why not 8/0.06
To pan nathi thatu
Dont waste time i did itok mane time app... hu lakhine moklu..
OkDont waste time i did it
For almost 10 years, the site XtremePapers has been trying very hard to serve its users.
However, we are now struggling to cover its operational costs due to unforeseen circumstances. If we helped you in any way, kindly contribute and be the part of this effort. No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
Click here to Donate Now