- Messages
- 109
- Reaction score
- 215
- Points
- 53
Understood?? For 4.(b) second part just that lambda formula nahHow did you get it?
We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)
Understood?? For 4.(b) second part just that lambda formula nahHow did you get it?
For the first part I assume that it would be equal to the wavelength of light(from the spectrum)
Did you understand 1(b) is it correct?That is what I thought as well but the ans is 0.3-3mm
Yes thnxDid you understand 1(b) is it correct?
Did you understand 1(b) is it correct?
Can you explain (d) as well
I am not getting it, meaning I am not getting the correct answer. I tried solving it using: depth x density x gravity
But it's not working sorry! If you get the answer lemme know too!
It's a one mark estimate question isn't it?
YesIt's a one mark estimate question isn't it?
Just like this:Guys I m confused like what do they mean by symbols in this
View attachment 52573
oh so only that Thanks a lotJust like this:
a: acceleration
w: angular speed
x: displacement from rest position
Because Cell A is charging Cell B and whenever a cell is charging we add both the e.m.f's .
According to lenz's law, emf tends to oppose the change causing it, so here, sketch will just have opposite peaks, and when current is constant, no emf on sketch, since no emf is induced when there is no change
For almost 10 years, the site XtremePapers has been trying very hard to serve its users.
However, we are now struggling to cover its operational costs due to unforeseen circumstances. If we helped you in any way, kindly contribute and be the part of this effort. No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
Click here to Donate Now