- Messages
- 109
- Reaction score
- 215
- Points
- 53
Understood?? For 4.(b) second part just that lambda formula nahHow did you get it?
🚀 NEW from the xtremepape.rs team: AI exam prep — 120,000+ worked solutions, and it marks your handwritten working from a photo. Sign in with your forum account & try it free → prepare.xtremepape.rs
Understood?? For 4.(b) second part just that lambda formula nahHow did you get it?
For the first part I assume that it would be equal to the wavelength of light(from the spectrum)
Did you understand 1(b) is it correct?That is what I thought as well but the ans is 0.3-3mm
Yes thnxDid you understand 1(b) is it correct?
Did you understand 1(b) is it correct?
Can you explain (d) as well
I am not getting it, meaning I am not getting the correct answer. I tried solving it using: depth x density x gravity
But it's not working sorry! If you get the answer lemme know too!
It's a one mark estimate question isn't it?
YesIt's a one mark estimate question isn't it?
Just like this:Guys I m confused like what do they mean by symbols in this
View attachment 52573
oh so only that Thanks a lotJust like this:
a: acceleration
w: angular speed
x: displacement from rest position
Because Cell A is charging Cell B and whenever a cell is charging we add both the e.m.f's .
According to lenz's law, emf tends to oppose the change causing it, so here, sketch will just have opposite peaks, and when current is constant, no emf on sketch, since no emf is induced when there is no change
🚀 NEW from the xtremepape.rs team: AI exam prep — 120,000+ worked solutions, and it marks your handwritten working from a photo. Sign in with your forum account & try it free → prepare.xtremepape.rs