• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

Physics: Post your doubts here!

Messages
340
Reaction score
339
Points
73
Is Physics harder than Chemistry? I'll be taking AS Physics in Nov of 2016, since I'm taking AS Chemistry, Biology and Mathematics this summer, I was wondering whether I'll find Physics even harder than Chemistry or is it better than that?
 
Messages
140
Reaction score
414
Points
73
Is Physics harder than Chemistry? I'll be taking AS Physics in Nov of 2016, since I'm taking AS Chemistry, Biology and Mathematics this summer, I was wondering whether I'll find Physics even harder than Chemistry or is it better than that?
Depends on which you have more interest in really. And they are two totally different subjects so dunno if we can compare their difficulty level. But I find chemistry questions more complicated than in physics ... especially AS.
 
Messages
340
Reaction score
339
Points
73
Depends on which you have more interest in really. And they are two totally different subjects so dunno if we can compare their difficulty level. But I find chemistry questions more complicated than in physics ... especially AS.
I understand...and I think I'm better interested in Physics than in chemistry! Chemistry is just a helll!!
which subs are you taking?
 
Messages
9
Reaction score
5
Points
13
I forgot the question. :p But if the gradient of velocity-time graph is different it means the acceleration of motion at those times are different.

Yes I know that. Can you please tell me why are the accelerations different?

This is the question
upload_2016-2-20_12-40-34-png.59335

upload_2016-2-20_12-40-53-png.59336
 
Messages
140
Reaction score
414
Points
73
Yes I know that. Can you please tell me why are the accelerations different?

This is the question
upload_2016-2-20_12-40-34-png.59335

upload_2016-2-20_12-40-53-png.59336
Ah yeah, it's this question.

Once the string is cut, the log doesn't immediately fall down. (I believe you understood that.) In the log's motion upward after the string is cut, there is friction acting on the same side as the component of weight - along the slope. So the addition of both forces divided by the mass of the log would give you acceleration.
On the other hand, once the log reaches a zero velocity, that is the maximum height it can go up to. Then, it starts falling down. In this part of its motion, the component of weight along the slope is opposed by the friction. So, acceleration would be the difference in both forces over the mass of the log.
Hence, the two accelerations are different and you get two different v-t gradients.

Hope you got it.
 
Messages
9
Reaction score
7
Points
13
Few days back i searched every website i knew, no where a yearly binder with marks schemes was available.
When i was tired of finding thought why don't make one and help others.
Took me 4 hours but yes i made it :LOL::LOL::LOL:;);):cool::cool::cool::cool:.

Find it here :
https://www.dropbox.com/s/2qooifqxgpu47cq/P4 MJ_02-ON_15 (YEARLY).pdf?dl=0
_____________________________________________
__________________________________
_________________________
Time is precious waste it wisely.
 
Last edited:
Messages
51
Reaction score
18
Points
18
Few days back i searched every website i knew, no where a yearly binder with marks schemes was available.
When i was tired of finding thought why don't make one and help others.
Took me 4 hours but yes i made it :LOL::LOL::LOL:;);):cool::cool::cool::cool:.
_____________________________________________
__________________________________
_________________________
Time is precious waste it wisely.
Great. :D
Are you going to upload here?
 
Messages
1,318
Reaction score
1,374
Points
173
View attachment 59421
Hey,
Could anyone please provide me with the reasoning for the following questions of the photoelectric effect:
a) In graph 2 why does increase in frequency cause current to increase at a decreasing rate?
b)In graph 3 and 4 , what does negative stopping potential imply?Like what exactly does it mean?

Please help.:)
a - photoelectric current is the no. of photons hitting the metal causing emission - so it's dependent on intensity and not frequency (E=hf) so as f becomes greater than threshold f, current increases until some time after which it'll become constant as intensity will be constant
b - check here http://www.s-cool.co.uk/a-level/phy.../photoelectric-current-and-stopping-potential
 
Messages
86
Reaction score
96
Points
18
a - photoelectric current is the no. of photons hitting the metal causing emission - so it's dependent on intensity and not frequency (E=hf) so as f becomes greater than threshold f, current increases until some time after which it'll become constant as intensity will be constant
b - check here http://www.s-cool.co.uk/a-level/phy.../photoelectric-current-and-stopping-potential
Thank youuu once again!:) But I have a slight query if it depends on intensity then why does increase in frequency trigger initially an increase in current? Like, The way I am seeing: when we increase the frequency the electrons gain more ke so the flow faster and since current is the rate of flow of charged particles it increases.However,eventually what happens is that intensity affects the number of electrons emitted per unit time(I am right?:/ :p) so since intensity is constant the current turns out to be constant as nos of electrons are same. Is my analysis correct?:p I am confused slightly?:/:p :D :)

Oh and yeah:p the following seems a pretty silly question but the contradictory nature is perplexing me.:p If you have an answer as to what would be ideal?:p
upload_2016-2-23_15-32-7-png.59436

upload_2016-2-23_15-32-22-png.59437

upload_2016-2-23_15-32-33-png.59438

Somehow the answers are contradictory in nature.:/ Should the answer simply be a bright spot?:p

Thank you.:D
 
Messages
1,318
Reaction score
1,374
Points
173
Thank youuu once again!:) But I have a slight query if it depends on intensity then why does increase in frequency trigger initially an increase in current? Like, The way I am seeing: when we increase the frequency the electrons gain more ke so the flow faster and since current is the rate of flow of charged particles it increases.However,eventually what happens is that intensity affects the number of electrons emitted per unit time(I am right?:/ :p) so since intensity is constant the current turns out to be constant as nos of electrons are same. Is my analysis correct?:p I am confused slightly?:/:p :D :)

Oh and yeah:p the following seems a pretty silly question but the contradictory nature is perplexing me.:p If you have an answer as to what would be ideal?:p
upload_2016-2-23_15-32-7-png.59436

upload_2016-2-23_15-32-22-png.59437

upload_2016-2-23_15-32-33-png.59438

Somehow the answers are contradictory in nature.:/ Should the answer simply be a bright spot?:p

Thank you.:D
Yeah the way you're writing it seems right since eventually the intensity is constant so no. of e- emitted is constant so the current will be constant :p
so yep :)
And for the other question that you've posted I have no idea xP
 
Messages
86
Reaction score
96
Points
18
Yeah the way you're writing it seems right since eventually the intensity is constant so no. of e- emitted is constant so the current will be constant :p
so yep :)
And for the other question that you've posted I have no idea xP


Thank youuu.:D Cool, lol no problem.:) :D :p :D
 
Top