• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

Physics: Post your doubts here!

Messages
144
Reaction score
137
Points
53

3:

a) Binding energy is the energy required to separate the nucleons in a nucleus to infinity.

OR

Binding energy is the energy required to bring together nucleons in a nucleus from infinity. (first definition preferred)

b) ii)

Mass defect, ∆m = 211.70394 – 209.93722
= 1.76672u

binding energy = 1.76672 × 930

binding energy per nucleon = (1.76672 × 930)/210

= 7.82 MeV

Divide by 210 because there are 210 nucleons, and the questions asks for binding energy "per nucleon".

Hope this helps!
 
Messages
50
Reaction score
24
Points
18
Q. When a potential difference V is applied between the ends of a wire of a diameter d and lenght l, the current in the wire is I. What is the current when a potential difference of 2V is applied between the ends of a wire of the same material of diameter 2d and the lenght 2I?
SOMEONE PLS HELP WITH THIS Q!
 
Messages
144
Reaction score
137
Points
53
Q. When a potential difference V is applied between the ends of a wire of a diameter d and lenght l, the current in the wire is I. What is the current when a potential difference of 2V is applied between the ends of a wire of the same material of diameter 2d and the lenght 2I?
SOMEONE PLS HELP WITH THIS Q!

Resistance is proportional to length, and inversely proportional to diameter/radius squared.

Let the resistance of the first wire be R.

Resistance of second wire = 2*(1/4) R = 0.5R

Current = 2V/0.5R = 4I
 
Messages
50
Reaction score
24
Points
18
Resistance is proportional to length, and inversely proportional to diameter/radius squared.

Let the resistance of the first wire be R.

Resistance of second wire = 2*(1/4) R = 0.5R

Current = 2V/0.5R = 4I
THANYOUUU YOU MADE IT SO EASY! I was trying to solve it in twisted way
 
Messages
7
Reaction score
2
Points
13
This is paper 5 of 2015. I wanted to ask if the way of writing is okay ? Particularly if i should write in continuous prose or if points are fine
 

Attachments

  • Scan_20170127 (2).jpg
    Scan_20170127 (2).jpg
    419.3 KB · Views: 3
  • Scan_20170127 (3).jpg
    Scan_20170127 (3).jpg
    448.5 KB · Views: 3
  • Scan_20170127.jpg
    Scan_20170127.jpg
    329.7 KB · Views: 4
Messages
8,477
Reaction score
34,837
Points
698
This is paper 5 of 2015. I wanted to ask if the way of writing is okay ? Particularly if i should write in continuous prose or if points are fine
Hey there. I haven't read those points as I am sure you would have checked from marking scheme. Answering your question you can do whatever you want but I would strongly encourage you to write in paragraph format. I will tell you my personal experience about paper 5; I started it with writing in point format as that looked quick and easy method and as all the points if I cover in point format then no need of paragraph format, I use to get full marks in method but wasn't able to score in additional details. I thought lets try paragraph format may be that could help me. AND IT DID!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! BINGO! In paragraph format there were many things that I could included which I was unable to add in point form, idk why, but the para foormat worked great with me I started getting 28 or 29 or 30 marks with that. So it all depends on you. If you can cover all points in point format then GO FOR THAT! but if u have problem like me try the way I did. xD

RIP my English. :p Ignore it. :D
 
Messages
89
Reaction score
15
Points
18
The question is 'describe the effect if any on the separation and on the maximum brightness of the fringes when the following changes are made.
The wavelength is increased by 1.5 factor keeping a and D constant
Effect on separation................. ....
Effect on maximum brightness of fringes ..
 
Messages
25
Reaction score
5
Points
13
Hi, can someone please explain how to do the graph for part c? this is mj 2016 paper 42
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2017-02-24 at 8.31.23 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2017-02-24 at 8.31.23 PM.png
    723.3 KB · Views: 15
Messages
252
Reaction score
123
Points
53
Hi, can someone please explain how to do the graph for part c? this is mj 2016 paper 42
17022320_1811334162463734_4707874945957989174_n.jpg
 
Messages
25
Reaction score
5
Points
13
mj 2016/42 q 9 bii
Help anyone??
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2017-03-02 at 4.51.09 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2017-03-02 at 4.51.09 PM.png
    61.3 KB · Views: 11
Messages
132
Reaction score
46
Points
38
Hey guys, I have this doubt that's been bugging me for so long now.

Why is the electric potential inside a charge conducting sphere constant?
Why is the electric field inside a charge conducting sphere equal to zero? (I know that since there is no change in potential, E = 0 but isn't there any explanation for that?)

It'd be really helpful if you guys could clear this for me and I'd love a simple/precise explanation that is A Level based.

Thank you. :)
 
Messages
260
Reaction score
104
Points
53
Hey guys, I have this doubt that's been bugging me for so long now.

Why is the electric potential inside a charge conducting sphere constant?
Why is the electric field inside a charge conducting sphere equal to zero? (I know that since there is no change in potential, E = 0 but isn't there any explanation for that?)

It'd be really helpful if you guys could clear this for me and I'd love a simple/precise explanation that is A Level based.

Thank you. :)
Both questions can be answered by the same fact: electric charge is distributed uniformly inside the conducting sphere.

When outside the sphere, the electric field is not uniform - it is more concentrated nearer the sphere surface. This means there is a "concentration gradient" outside the sphere (with respect to distance).
Electric field is actually a measure of the magnitude of this gradient.
Electric potential is actually a measure of the integral of this gradient.


But when inside the conducting sphere, charge is uniform everywhere, meaning there is no such gradient, or gradient is zero.
Since gradient = 0 everywhere in the sphere:
- Electric field is zero.
- The integral is constant, which means electric potential is constant.
 
Last edited:
Top