We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)
You should post this in some physics thread. Your previous questions were related to mechanics. That's why I could help. I don't know physicsCan someone tell me the final answer and working for this question please?
Yes, Im getting the same. I believe we are not wrong. There must be a problem with the question. Which year is it?plz help the answer i am getting is 1 / -y ( 1+y )
Okay. Waitingyeah !! i am searching for the paper year !! i will tell u
couldn't find .. i hope our answers are correct !yeah !! i am searching for the paper year !! i will tell u
Listen. We are wrong. Why? because if you take note of your solution. You get the limit 1 when x is zero. and limit 0.5 when x is ln2. Observe how the position changes of both the values. Before transformation we have ln2 as the larger limit but when we calcute y we get 1/2 which is the smaller value in the transformation. Therefore, When this happens, The sign of the expression can changecouldn't find .. i hope our answers are correct !
Ohh ! i didnt know about this points . BTW thanksListen. We are wrong. Why? because if you take note of your solution. You get the limit 1 when x is zero. and limit 0.5 when x is ln2. Observe how the position changes of both the values. Before transformation we have ln2 as the larger limit but when we calcute y we get 1/2 which is the smaller value in the transformation. Therefore, When this happens, The sign of the expression can change![]()
So we just have to put a minus sign in this situation ?!?
Oh no no. You're flipping the limits, right? So the sign will flip as well. Your negative sign will be changed to positive sign and so, You will get the correct transformation.So we just have to put a minus sign in this situation ?!?
Im trying to open the link but its not working for me ...anyways can you please have a look in to that book and lemm know if itcontains the probability using sets and venn diagramsYes, the book is available online, check this website:
http://www.aliensservices.com/E-books.html
As for the solved papers, it's difficult, a mere chance, that they'll be available for S2, very few students choose S2, but I'll search and let you know if I find!
Look. When you have a fraction. And you have to integrate it.View attachment 57680 Can anyone please explain me why the integration of (1/1+y^2) is tan inverse y and how the integration of y/1+y^2 gives .5ln(1+y^2) ???
Also. Is there any substitution given in the question?View attachment 57680 Can anyone please explain me why the integration of (1/1+y^2) is tan inverse y and how the integration of y/1+y^2 gives .5ln(1+y^2) ???
Look. When you have a fraction. And you have to integrate it.
Consider the denominator. differentiate it. If your differentiated expression is the same as your numerator then you can simply use log to integrate. If not then see if you can make it the same by multiplying. For example. In the above case. Your denominator is
1+y^2
Now differentiate it and you will get 2y right? BUT you have only y in numerator. Therefore you will make them same by taking out 1/2 and then simply use log. I hope Im coherent enough for you to understand.
It will become 0.5ln(1+y^2)
If its still not clear then let me know I will try and explain via working step by step.
NO..nothing as such is given in the question.A
Also. Is there any substitution given in the question?
For almost 10 years, the site XtremePapers has been trying very hard to serve its users.
However, we are now struggling to cover its operational costs due to unforeseen circumstances. If we helped you in any way, kindly contribute and be the part of this effort. No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
Click here to Donate Now