• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

2013 elections

who r u supporting in the elections 2013

  • Total voters
    100
  • Poll closed .
avenger

avenger

Messages
381
Reaction score
4,640
Points
253
Nabeel.Ahmad said:
I am sure because democracy has proved completely useless. Study the period from 2000-2007, you will know how much Pakistan was developed during that period. But sadly the time from 2008-2013 of democracy ruined everything.
Our whole political system is full of corruption.
CORRUPTION has spread to the roots of all the sectors, economy, industry, politics.. everything!
Going back to the same 5 year democratic system is not going to get rid of that.
In order to re-establish a new path to success..
A STRONG DISCIPLINED DICTATOR is required.
Who will take over by force..
Throw all the Corrupt Politicians in jail..
Dissolve all the assemblies.
Ban all the political parties.
And Introduce a NEW SYSTEM.. by COMPLETELY ending the previous one.
Introducing a new CONSTITUTION that should be strictly followed.
That is the only way to End The Corruption and Decline.
And that is the sole way for Development and Progress. :) My Opinion considering the past 66 years of Pakistan's History.
Click to expand...
well, there was Zia era as well. If a party/government couldnt run the country well on democracy, that doesnt mean democracy is wrong. It's just that the government is wrong/corrupt/unwilling to work for the betterment for the country. Corruption can be removed by replacing the CORRUPT DEMOCRATIC goverment rather than replacing democracy. A dictator can be a corrupt one as well, so u cant say that the only way, adn the sure way to end corruption is introduce dictatorship.
Yes, Musharraf's time did bring some progress, but it had negative points as well. I wont say the lal masjid issue because actually i dont think musharraf was very wrong in that issue, but the present terrosism, (not our war), too much dependence on America and allowing it to set up roots here, these drone attacks (which are obviously due to bowing ourselves in front America), were Musharraf's fault, AND they are very grave ones. Pakistan has had to suffer, is suffering, coz of that.
Zia's era need no explaination.

..sacrifice4Revenge.. said:
Honestly, Pakistan would do better under a dictator, jamhooriat dekh hi lii aap ne, THis ILLITERATE Nation does not deserve democracy...
Click to expand...
Yes when u talk about the level of illiteracy in Pakistan, I do think democracy will harm Pakistan BECAUSE the majority of people here will vote based on bradari-ism etc. Others wont vote, saying 'sab aik hi jesay hain'. So yeah, an illiterate person's vote when holding the same power as the person who votes a certain party on the basis of solid reasons, causes problems. BUT if this illetracy issue is solved, i think democracy can be much better than dictatorship.
 
Nabeel.Ahmad

Nabeel.Ahmad

Messages
3,091
Reaction score
8,272
Points
523
Democracy is right for a country where Majority of the people are literate and can judge the people and decide on a good leader.
Here in Pakistan the Literacy Rate is 56%, and 66% of the population lives in Villages and they have no idea what's happening.
They just vote for the Party which makes fake promises to them.
EVERY PARTY MAKES FALSE PROMISES.
The Bad Corrupt Parties go to the villages and get votes using bribes and money.
So a Good Democratic Government is not possible.

avenger said:
well, there was Zia era as well. If a party/government couldnt run the country well on democracy, that doesnt mean democracy is wrong. It's just that the government is wrong/corrupt/unwilling to work for the betterment for the country. Corruption can be removed by replacing the CORRUPT DEMOCRATIC goverment rather than replacing democracy. A dictator can be a corrupt one as well, so u cant say that the only way, adn the sure way to end corruption is introduce dictatorship.
Yes, Musharraf's time did bring some progress, but it had negative points as well. I wont say the lal masjid issue because actually i dont think musharraf was very wrong in that issue, but the present terrosism, (not our war), too much dependence on America and allowing it to set up roots here, these drone attacks (which are obviously due to bowing ourselves in front America), were Musharraf's fault, AND they are very grave ones. Pakistan has had to suffer, is suffering, coz of that.
Zia's era need no explaination.

Yes when u talk about the level of illiteracy in Pakistan, I do think democracy will harm Pakistan BECAUSE the majority of people here will vote based on bradari-ism etc. Others wont vote, saying 'sab aik hi jesay hain'. So yeah, an illiterate person's vote when holding the same power as the person who votes a certain party on the basis of solid reasons, causes problems. BUT if this illetracy issue is solved, i think democracy can be much better than dictatorship.
Click to expand...
 
avenger

avenger

Messages
381
Reaction score
4,640
Points
253
Nabeel.Ahmad said:
Democracy is right for a country where Majority of the people are literate and can judge the people and decide on a good leader.
Here in Pakistan the Literacy Rate is 56%, and 66% of the population lives in Villages and they have no idea what's happening.
They just vote for the Party which makes fake promises to them.
EVERY PARTY MAKES FALSE PROMISES.
The Bad Corrupt Parties go to the villages and get votes using bribes and money.
So a Good Democratic Government is not possible.
Click to expand...
thats kinda what i said, no?
Even dictators wont fulfill every promise they would make while taking over the government. Absolute power can corrupt the nicest of persons so easily.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top