- Messages
- 327
- Reaction score
- 166
- Points
- 53
For that experiment I wrote:
Place a nail in each of 4 test tubes with 30cm3 of water.
In three of the test tubes place 10 cm3 of corrosion inhibitor (so R/S/T are in a seperate test tube and one is left empty)
Measure the mass of each test tube + it's contents
Then every 12* hours measure the new mass + rust which has formed, and use this + original mass to find increase in mass
a) If R/S/T actually inhibit rusting then there rate of increase of mass (due to rust formation) will be less than that of the tube without any retardant (the control one)
b) The best inhibitor will have the smallest rate of increase of mass
[I wrote them both cause it asked to prove that they inhibit rust AND to show how to find out which one is best]
EDIT: I wrote 12 hours (half a day) not six.
Place a nail in each of 4 test tubes with 30cm3 of water.
In three of the test tubes place 10 cm3 of corrosion inhibitor (so R/S/T are in a seperate test tube and one is left empty)
Measure the mass of each test tube + it's contents
Then every 12* hours measure the new mass + rust which has formed, and use this + original mass to find increase in mass
a) If R/S/T actually inhibit rusting then there rate of increase of mass (due to rust formation) will be less than that of the tube without any retardant (the control one)
b) The best inhibitor will have the smallest rate of increase of mass
[I wrote them both cause it asked to prove that they inhibit rust AND to show how to find out which one is best]
EDIT: I wrote 12 hours (half a day) not six.