• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

Chemistry: Post your doubts here!

Messages
30
Reaction score
5
Points
18
Hello again, there’s a question that’s rather bothering . Can someone just explain why is it the “b” optionView attachment 65252
We use what is called the Hund's rule to fill up the atomic orbitals. Electrons fill up lower energy levels before they can fill higher ones. In this case we have 1st,2nd and 3rd energy levels . So electrons will fill up 1 then 2 then 3 in that order.
One thing to note too is that electrons will fill empty atomic orbitals before they can start pairing.
The atom in question has 8 electrons and thus 2 will go to the 1s orbital and the remaining 6 will go to the 2s and 2p respectively. When the 6 fill up the 2nd energy level orbitals , 2 will fill the 2s leaving 4 electrons . 3 of those will fill up the 2p orbitals (1 per orbital) and the remaining 1 will go to pair with one of the electrons in the 2p orbitals since the 3s is of a higher energy level.

The reason for all of this is due to two reasons I know of . The first one regarding the order of the filling of energy levels is due to atoms wanting to have the least potential energy possible which makes them very stable . If the atom was to have an electon which would be in a higher energy level this would make it unstable as the electron would be further away from the attraction of the nucleus making it veryyyyyyyy susceptible to being lost thus making the atom unstable . (Which is why Francium is highly reactive as it has an electron in a higher energy level)
The reason now for the filling of atomic orbitals is in order to minimise repulsions between electrons occupying the same energy level. Electrons will tend to be further away since they have the same charge. If electrons are closer to one another they tend to push each other away which makes the atom unstable . I hope I have answered you.
 
Messages
30
Reaction score
5
Points
18
And how does the box diagram look like for elements beyond potassium , how do we fill it diagrammatically
There will be introduction of the d orbitals which will be tedious to explain here. But the same principles of orbital filling apply . I will post a link to a YouTube video
 
Messages
7
Reaction score
1
Points
3
Can anyone help solve this, I used Mr=MRT/PV but I couldn't get a proper value.

When an evacuated glass tube of volume 200cm^3 is filled with a gas at 300k and 101kPa the mass of the tube increases by 1.06g.

What is the identity of the gas?

A) Argon
B) Krypton
C) Neon
D) Xenon
 
Messages
30
Reaction score
5
Points
18
View attachment 65257Can anyone explain the first point , and why’s its wrong and the third one
Heyy ... I had to ask for help because I was bamboozled by the fact that 1 is not correct. Here's the deal. 1 is wrong because the equilibrium pressure will only be reached once the external pressure (atmospheric pressure) is equal to the internal pressure .Work will be done by the expanding gas until the pressures inside and out even each other . This is an application of some Isobaric Processes Theory I suggest you look that up.

Number 3 can be explained in two ways . The English there was a bit tricky for me 😂😂😂 . (1)Well the expanding gas(from dissociation products) pushes back on the plunger and hence that is the increase in the volume there
(2) There's increase in moles of gases and since moles of gases directly proportional to the volume from PV=nRT thus theres a higher volume than there would be if no dissociation occurred
 
Messages
37
Reaction score
15
Points
18
Heyy ... I had to ask for help because I was bamboozled by the fact that 1 is not correct. Here's the deal. 1 is wrong because the equilibrium pressure will only be reached once the external pressure (atmospheric pressure) is equal to the internal pressure .Work will be done by the expanding gas until the pressures inside and out even each other . This is an application of some Isobaric Processes Theory I suggest you look that up.

Number 3 can be explained in two ways . The English there was a bit tricky for me 😂😂😂 . (1)Well the expanding gas(from dissociation products) pushes back on the plunger and hence that is the increase in the volume there
(2) There's increase in moles of gases and since moles of gases directly proportional to the volume from PV=nRT thus theres a higher volume than there would be if no dissociation occurred
I’m mind blown right now😂😂 that’s such an important pointer right there
Thank you so muchhh. I tried to research about any relationship between the equilibrium pressure and atmospheric pressure , but I couldn’t .
 
Messages
37
Reaction score
15
Points
18
Hello ,
Can anyone help solve this, I used Mr=MRT/PV but I couldn't get a proper value.

When an evacuated glass tube of volume 200cm^3 is filled with a gas at 300k and 101kPa the mass of the tube increases by 1.06g.

What is the identity of the gas?

A) Argon
B) Krypton
C) Neon
D) Xenon
check your conversions of pressure and volume , because I got 130.8 as the answer which I assume is for Xenon
 
Messages
30
Reaction score
5
Points
18
I’m mind blown right now😂😂 that’s such an important pointer right there
Thank you so muchhh. I tried to research about any relationship between the equilibrium pressure and atmospheric pressure , but I couldn’t .
I’m mind blown right now😂😂 that’s such an important pointer right there
Thank you so muchhh. I tried to research about any relationship between the equilibrium pressure and atmospheric pressure , but I couldn’t .
My Pleasure 😊😊

Yeah it doesn't appear much in textbooks but here's where I trust that you will find it

Its a textbook
 
Messages
37
Reaction score
15
Points
18
My Pleasure 😊😊

Yeah it doesn't appear much in textbooks but here's where I trust that you will find it

Its a textbook
I can’t access it tho, but thank you anyway
 
Messages
30
Reaction score
5
Points
18
View attachment 65260

Can someone please solve part c (ii) and explain thanks in advance
c i) a yellow flame is seen . Since there's presence of the Sodium Ion so we expect the colour change when sodium is burnt ...

ii) We expect to see a blue solution. Since the basic CuO will react with the NaHSO4 to give NaSO4 + CuSO4 and water. We know for sure that Copper (ii) Oxide is basic(because it is an oxide of a metal) but you may be unsure about the acidity or basicity of HSO4-. The lewis structure of HSO4- shows that it has a hydrogen atom bonded to an oxygen atom . The Anion may act as a Brownsted Lowry acid and lose this proton(hydrogen) in chemical reactions because it has not undergone full deprotonation.(it would have undergone full deprotonation if it was SO4- . )
*Note that HSO4- is a derivative of SO4-

Therefore overall an acid base reaction will take place and we get a blue solution observed .
 
Messages
98
Reaction score
80
Points
28
¬Meet a Chemistry Academic 2020¬
Organized by ChemSoc & The Chemistry PASS Scheme
Interested in finding more about different themes in chemistry? This is the chance!
The event is open to anyone who has an interest in chemistry or a related field, including, but not limited to, physics, biology, biochemistry, environmental science, education and teaching. This includes students currently studying A/L's as well from any country and is a completely free event!

Register here: https://forms.gle/MzXWCuyDBPhHnWZ8A
Speakers include:

(a)22nd July 2020

1. Dr. David Mills (Inorganic Chemistry) - Inorganic Synthesis, Molecular magnetism & Spectroscopy.

Session suitable for those who have an interest in inorganic chemistry, inorganic spectroscopic analysis, and its applications including in nuclear fuel cycles and data storage.

2. Prof. Peter Budd (Materials Chemistry) - Novel Polymers, 2D materials & Membranes for Molecular Separations.

Session suitable for those who have an interest in materials chemistry, industrial separations and membrane technologies.

3. Dr. Kristy Turner (Chemical Education) - STEM Teaching, portfolio careers & science communication.

Session suitable for those who have an interest in teaching, science writing and communication as well as other careers that are possible after completing a STEM based degree.

4. Prof. Perdita Barran & Dr. Drupad Trivedi (Analytical Chemistry) - Mass spectrometry, chemometrics and it’s applications to biomarker discovery and on tuberculosis.

Session suitable for those who have an interest in analytical science, including mass spectrometry, and its applications in diagnosis of Parkinson's disease and TB.

(b) 23rd July 2020
1. Dr. Nicholas F. Chilton (Theoretical Chemistry) - Quantum Chemistry & Computational Chemistry

Session suitable for those who have an interest in quantum mechanics, science based program development and theoretical chemistry.

2. Prof. Igor Larrosa (Organic Chemistry) - Catalysis & Organic Synthesis

Session suitable for those who have an interest in organic chemistry, including catalysis and organic synthesis.

3. Dr. Nicholas Weise (Chemical Biology) - Biocatalysis, sustainable chemistry & Public Engagement

Session suitable for those who have an interest in enzymes and their applications, sustainable development of existing chemical processes & in public engagement.

Any questions, please feel free to message or email at [email protected]!
 

Attachments

  • poster.pdf
    498.9 KB · Views: 1
Top