- Messages
- 106
- Reaction score
- 171
- Points
- 53
my value was 11It got the value of 11.1, so wrote 12 bands were required. What about your's?
We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)
my value was 11It got the value of 11.1, so wrote 12 bands were required. What about your's?
i think, no. coz we have to make it parallel to the incident ray considering the glass-to-air refractive index.
HI5!!!!!!!!!!!Well for the beaker and rod question, and how to accurately measure it, I simply mentioned dropping a few droplets of ink into the water; letting it diffuse and then removing the rod. And afterwards, measuring the rod from the top to the point where the ink stain will be visible.
was it parallel to incident ray?
i dont think so cuz i made it on estimationwas it parallel to incident ray?
well, you may get a mark coz you made it bending away from normal. I am not the examiner to decide anythingi dont think so cuz i made it on estimation
SILLY MISTAKES
It all depends on the examinerwell, you may get a mark coz you made it bending away from normal. I am not the examiner to decide anything
HI5!!!!!!!!!!!
same here
yesIt all depends on the examiner
In Shaa Allah.Well then, I hope we're both right.
the question was use your graph to find the smallest number of rubber band to sink the rod ?Can someone answer the question about number of rubber bands needed to sink the rod?
you have written the highest number of rubber bands yaar the question was find the samallest value of rubber bands to sink the rod ? how can it be 11 ? 11 rubber band say tu pura pura rod hy dob jai ga hahahha
noo how can it be yaar we have to write valu of refractive index !funky brat We had to write ratio? What are they talking about? :/
i think we cannot put ruler into water remeber the first part of this question it was asked that why it is difficult to measure the lenth l ?Fate0
Question 1 part b. How to measure Length L correctly.
I said immerse the rule into the water as zero mark co-incides with the water level.
And then align it vertically with rod, and use set-square to find the answer. I also drew all this apparatus on the figure.
EVERYONE HAS A DIFFERENT WAY.
Someone is using a cobalt chloride paper.
Someone is pulling out the rod, and marking the water prints.
Someone is marking the beaker.
Someone is inserting the rule on the side.
Is my answer right?
it has 25% baby see redspot past papers all writtenChill out, now. ATP has only 20% percentage. Lets focus on the P2. But my teacher says it's gonna be hard
obviously
the question was find the smallest number of rubber bands to sink the rode yar how can it be 11 it is highest number of rubber band the answer was 1i was 11 acording to my graph
sink means fully immersed the graph was to be extended and line met just before 11 where the length "l" was zero and "N" bands were 11.you have written the highest number of rubber bands yaar the question was find the samallest value of rubber bands to sink the rod ? how can it be 11 ? 11 rubber band say tu pura pura rod hy dob jai ga hahahha
i think we cannot put ruler into water remeber the first part of this question it was asked that why it is difficult to measure the lenth l ?
the answer was we could not brought the ruler close to the rode !
how was eng?The answer was that the rod keeps, that is why we can not correctly align the rule with the rod, which leads to parallax error.
But in the next part they asked how to measure L accurately.
So i proposed a way to remove parallax error, by using a set-square..
For almost 10 years, the site XtremePapers has been trying very hard to serve its users.
However, we are now struggling to cover its operational costs due to unforeseen circumstances. If we helped you in any way, kindly contribute and be the part of this effort. No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
Click here to Donate Now