HOW WAS PHY P33?????

[rethna30]

was ur y intercept positive or negative and wat was the gradient

LOL...everything was fine....thx to PrincessZahra, Krypton Man(MAVtKnmj..... hard to spell), ashhadazam..and to all friends....


Exactly like predicted.....
My intercept was a negative ( around -9.81) and gradient 1.19...
First plot point for "2V"of power supply was funny too...far from my line of best fit...

 

[ashhadazam]

I am talking about the broken scale on y-axis.. If u take broken scale there u get ur intercept wrong !!

 

[samir]

ya intercept even i got negative......but werent the points like acurve then why a straight line , means gradient wold largely vary rite............

 

[stud91]

No he hasn't screwed his intercept part. It is not necessary to start from zero.

 

[hahahaha]

every one is having variable gradients wats the most common?

 

[ashhadazam]

nah.. u dint get me rite.. I mean to say that if u take broken scale u get intercept wrong... otw its fine.. If u do tkae broken scale then u need to find the intercept through the equation !!

 

[tricky]

most of da stdnts in my center got gradient round abt 0.3 to 0.4.....

 

[stud91]

yeah that right. Mine was 0.31

 

[ajmaeen]

was it necessary to convert the current reading from milliampere to ampere??.......... i did all my calculation in mA.......... so got the grad 730mA/V^10............................... that makes it .73 in Ampere................. and i got the y intercept exactly 0................

 

[intel1993]

hey paper went awsome......
n yes y intercept was negative we had to finf it out frm equation....

n the gradient is 0.043 which is confirmed by many other studentrs as well in my centre....

 

[tricky]

i did in AMPERES nd dnt knw it was necessary or not nd ya abt intercept many of stdnts here too got 0 as well as in positive but i got in negative.....

 

[stud91]

that's right mine was also negative. But it was too small like 10^-3 something. So i think its correct

 

[tricky]

yaa it wass very small like i thnk 0.001 sumthing i got....i thnk soooo

 

[hahahaha]

hey paper went awsome......
n yes y intercept was negative we had to finf it out frm equation....

n the gradient is 0.043 which is confirmed by many other studentrs as well in my centre....

which was ur center

 

[intel1993]

hey trick is ur oil terminal velocity relation proved????

 

[ajmaeen]

well i realized at the last moment that the ammeter setting was at mA........... so i just added a m in the unit............ i hope it wasnt necessary to convert it ............... but agr hoa bhi tau i think max 1 mark katay ga is ka

 

[intel1993]

my own skul...

KIMS defence............


@hahaha: wat abt urs..??

 

[stud91]

yeah the relationship was right. My %age difference was like 10%

 

[ashhadazam]

wow thats gr8.. u got ur centre at ur own scool !!

 

[intel1993]

yup.................was not a new environment 4 me.....just an advantage available..........