• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

How was Physics 6PH08 Alternative to practical ?

Messages
134
Reaction score
10
Points
28
Question 1 part (a) was 1, the measurement of volume was 2 I think, and percentage uncertainty in volume was 3
 
Messages
98
Reaction score
9
Points
18
Hmmmm yeah I think soo!
In the pastpaers we use dat 0.1 mm value when there is only one reading!
We might had to show dat 0% to get 3 marks!
% uncertainty in mean volume was 1.9%, right? because % uncertainty in diameter was 0.4%.Also, i got 1.54 Hz for resonant frequency and observation was that spring would oscillate with maximum amplitude. Am I right??
 
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Points
16
% uncertainty in mean volume was 1.9%, right? because % uncertainty in diameter was 0.4%.Also, i got 1.54 Hz for resonant frequency and observation was that spring would oscillate with maximum amplitude. Am I right??
How did u get % uncertainty in diamter??
if u used the precision of the vernier calliper to find it than why didnt u use the precision of micrometre to find the % uncertainty of the diameter?
 
Top