Math P62

[BILALrox01]

The book isn't the final word the MS is... Nd the graph isn't the grade question.. Q6 is.. I got .3 if i remeber correctly.. I'm not even sure of what i got...

 

[ahmed t]

q6 was surly .7sumin

 

[cyberpunk]

i think you can take 20 if the class is 10-20 , then 20-40...... But , if they say 10-20 , then 21-40 u have to take 20.5 .Thats what they said in the exam.

 

[xHazeMx]

i think you can take 20 if the class is 10-20 , then 20-40...... But , if they say 10-20 , then 21-40 u have to take 20.5 .Thats what they said in the exam.

100 % correct

 

[Gooners]

In exam
X
0<x<=20
20<x<=40

This is how it was in exam maybe .......... Nd it means no need fr class boundaries as one ends on 20 nd other starts frm <20 as in 20.1 ....hence no need fr class boundaries..correct me if I m wrong...

 

[xHazeMx]

it was
1<x<20
21<x<40
so u have to take class boundaries

 

[Gooners]

Furthur even if it was 0<x<=20 ---------- 21<x<=40.........it means that at max 20 or lesser value has that commutative frequency nd max 40 or lesser has that commutative frequency....... Hence no class boundaries.....as it was stated <=40......why make it 40.5?????????

 

[xHazeMx]

i don't remember the question actually but if it was like what u r saying then i think u r correct

 

[Gooners]

it was
1<x<20
21<x<40
so u have to take class boundaries

Yup it maybe like this but upper class boundary was definitely <= as I wnt through this question quite a lot of times.......

 

[xHazeMx]

well, let us hope for a good mark then

 

[shahdin]

Can anyone tell me the answers for Q3 (ii), Q5 (ii) and (iii), Q6 (ii) and Q7 last two parts?????

 

[cyberpunk]

it was
1<x<20
21<x<40
so u have to take class boundaries

Yup it maybe like this but upper class boundary was definitely <= as I wnt through this question quite a lot of times.......

Look bro , in exam there was no inequality sign. I saw carefully.
it was like this 10-20 , 21-40 , so there you go . In this case , in previous MS , ull see they used the .5 method. I think its a very common question and lots of examples can be found in the past papers.

 

[Gooners]

it was
1<x<20
21<x<40
so u have to take class boundaries

Yup it maybe like this but upper class boundary was definitely <= as I wnt through this question quite a lot of times.......

Look bro , in exam there was no inequality sign. I saw carefully.
it was like this 10-20 , 21-40 , so there you go . In this case , in previous MS , ull see they used the .5 method. I think its a very common question and lots of examples can be found in the past papers.

Ok bro....... No issues maybe I m wrong.?. Well u never kno......

 

[cyberpunk]

Let us all hope that Allah will bless us with A* s

 

[xHazeMx]

InshAllah

 

[Gooners]

Let us all hope that Allah will bless us with A* s

Inshallah.........

 

[108Pari]

mero pani bigrecha last!!totally wrecked!!i am so worried about maths this time..oct/nov jindabbaaaaddd!!

 

[Xtremeperson]

Listen guys!!! seems like,.,,,,, i have got no mistake\s.........thats feels great.........dont be mirthless okey.............seems like the world is awating another worldtop........I FEEL GOOOOOD>>>> :Yahoo!: :beer: =@ ..........................WHOOOHWHWHWAWAWA>W>AW>A> grade threshold is to be 100 /120 .....ncie......

 

[EzioAuditre]

for the expression i wrote 0.2 ˄n x5
is there any chnce of gettin one mark???

 

[BILALrox01]

ya i think cuz u got o.2 right u might git one mark..