- Messages
- 297
- Reaction score
- 696
- Points
- 93
i think that i got it 5Can someone please tell me for the collision question, what was T? Was it 8?
We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)
i think that i got it 5Can someone please tell me for the collision question, what was T? Was it 8?
Are you sure that it is 5? Did you take the distance for one body as 's' and the other body as 's+10' for the same time T and solve?i think that i got it 5
I'm 10000000% I'm correct.Dude. I posted the solution. ;_;View attachment 42759
Wow, you're really scaring me. But why have you taken them to be travelling in opposite directions. I dont remember reading that in the question. Are you sure that it mentioned the two objects travelling in opposite directions.I'm 10000000% I'm correct.
If they weren't travelling in opposite directions, how're they gonna collide? -_-...Wow, you're really scaring me. But why have you taken them to be travelling in opposite directions. I dont remember reading that in the question. Are you sure that it mentioned the two objects travelling in opposite directions.
thanksIf they weren't travelling in opposite directions, how're they gonna collide? -_-...
I dont know how energy is involved here. But since one is accelerating and the other is at constant velocity, eventually the one accelerating would collide with the constant velocity one. Maybe you're correct and I didnt read the question properly, but I just want to be sure.If they weren't travelling in opposite directions, how're they gonna collide? -_-...
Well, they could collide like that. But then it'd be more of a conservation of energy question, wouldn't it? Perfect collision, inelastic collision? We've done many past questions like this.
What was your solution, then?
I dont know how energy is involved here. But since one is accelerating and the other is at constant velocity, eventually the one accelerating would collide with the constant velocity one. Maybe you're correct and I didnt read the question properly, but I just want to be sure.
it wrongI dont know how energy is involved here. But since one is accelerating and the other is at constant velocity, eventually the one accelerating would collide with the constant velocity one. Maybe you're correct and I didnt read the question properly, but I just want to be sure.
Ok thanks, hopefully i get ecf or something.u read
it wrong
yeahThe Paper was awful . So hard
I can see that wired smile at the endDude. I posted the solution. ;_;View attachment 42759
;]I can see that wired smile at the end
For almost 10 years, the site XtremePapers has been trying very hard to serve its users.
However, we are now struggling to cover its operational costs due to unforeseen circumstances. If we helped you in any way, kindly contribute and be the part of this effort. No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
Click here to Donate Now