- Messages
- 42
- Reaction score
- 9
- Points
- 18
thanks for the helpur high crime rate is correct, i dont believe the same for high pop because that already understood and not exactly necessary so i wouldnt consider that
We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)
thanks for the helpur high crime rate is correct, i dont believe the same for high pop because that already understood and not exactly necessary so i wouldnt consider that
Hey wait a minute i ment to say high pollution not high population sorrythanks for the help
lol thts y i was wonderingHey wait a minute i ment to say high pollution not high population sorry
i didm't even know how to write my answers till three months ago but Praise be to Allah, i saw the mark scheme and now i do have a clear idea.hey can any plz help me understand marking schemes?? i knw dis might be a little laim but i just couldnt get them. the way they are written. wht do they axactly mean?? especially pak studies 1. here ix 1, if anyone of u could help me explain wht the marking scheme actually says about question 3 part b.......thnx!!
Some of the Scholars such as Zahris & Shia rejectmarking scheme says:
Why do some legal scholars reject the use of analogy (qiyas)? [4]
Excellent answers here will be able to give a sound analysis of the use of analogy (qiyas)
with possible, but clear, examples to illustrate the point. Examples should be about analogy
and not confused with any of the other sources of law.
Candidates could mention that it is a source used when others do not offer guidance, and
compares an existing accepted situation with a new one. There is more individual thought
that goes into the decisions than with primary sources.
Better answers will mention why it’s rejected by some scholars, due to the varying and
conflicting answers that can be given.
examiner report says:
There were some good answers to this question, but generally answers were vague. The best
answers offered reasons about the weakness of qiyas as a general source of law, explaining that it
was due to the fact that the personal opinion of an individual may be subject to error, and why
some scholars preferred the alternative ijma or the Shi’a preference of using ‘aql.
However, many answers had a general comment on qiyas not being liked because it is based on
individual reasoning, and there were a significant number of candidates who tried to argue that
qiyas is not needed in Islamic legal thinking, so instead of trying to answer why some scholars
reject qiyas they made a general statement about it not being reliable and so rejected by all
scholars.
aand, my notes say:
''Qiyas is the Fourth source of law, subordinate and subsidiary to the Quran, Hadith and Ijma. It is a principle of extension of islamic law on the basis of a likeness in two situations, one of which is explained in the primary sources, which it can not contradict.Qiyas must be applied only when there is no solution in the earlier sources.
An example of Qiyas: Drugs like opium or cocaine were not known during the time of the Prophet, so they have not been mentioned explicitly as prohibited. However a Hadith (primary source!) is : '' Every intoxicant is Khamr, so every intoxicant is Haraam.'' Thus, since it is known that these drugs are highly intoxicating, these are also Haram.
However, some scholars reject the concept of Qiyas on the basis of the Ayah: ''..And We have sent down to thee a Book explaining all things..'' (16:89).
Their opinion is that there is too much personal opinion involved in Qiyas, thus resulting contradicting ideas of different people. These various opinions are not considered binding and authoritative by many Sunni scholars, and Shia scholars reject Qiyas in favour of their use of Aql.''
pheww.. hope it makes sense, and helps you out!
what which one is to be described at first either the one which is given in statement or according to timeline?this question? :
''The Lucknow Pact of 1916 was the only beacon of hope for Hindu-Muslim Unity between 1914-1930. do you agree? give reasons for your answer.''
november 2004 q2 c
what which one is to be described at first either the one which is given in statementor according to timeline?In this we have to describe the following reforms:
-Morley-minto reforms 1909
-Montague Chelmsford reform 1919.
-Lucknow pact 1916 also
the one which is in the statement has to be described firstwhat which one is to be described at first either the one which is given in statementor according to timeline?
yes correct!!he meant that if the major reason has not been given in the question then do you write the conclusion at the begin or end,
in my opinion, obvious end as only then you'll be able to conclude properly since you cant just give a conclusion without explanation
post the questiont
thnx alot man! can u plx tell me abt q 3 B? (of the same paper)
and mark schemepost the question
dude are you really serious the whole answer!!Did educational reforms have a more important effect on the Indians than the social,
religious and economic ones introduced by the British during the years 1773 to 1856?
Explain your answer.
(14)
Plz can any 1 provide me with the complete answr ?? !! *likes guaranteed*
(b) Why did Jinnah produce his 14 Points in 1929? [7]and mark scheme
Why did jinnah produce his 14 points?hey can any plz help me understand marking schemes?? i knw dis might be a little laim but i just couldnt get them. the way they are written. wht do they axactly mean?? especially pak studies 1. here ix 1, if anyone of u could help me explain wht the marking scheme actually says about question 3 part b.......thnx!!
For almost 10 years, the site XtremePapers has been trying very hard to serve its users.
However, we are now struggling to cover its operational costs due to unforeseen circumstances. If we helped you in any way, kindly contribute and be the part of this effort. No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
Click here to Donate Now