physics paper 1,2 ........can we discuus da papper nw?

[MustafaMotani]

i am poor in languages but i have high hopes for others

me 2
currently I have 3A* and a B. And guess wat B was in urdu

 

[A star]

i was jst correctin him as i also have addmath

 

[MustafaMotani]

i was jst correctin him as i also have addmath

and so do I ..

 

[asad.manutd9]

u are so alike me

its good to be like this, isnt it?

 

[plantaholic]

it is a BLOG, not some informative website,showing a wave drawn by hand, and by someone called "XINLEI"!
I trust that blog as much as i trust ZARDARI! i have more exact answers in my books, thank you very much!

true k its just some random blog.. but its the only place where ive seen particle movement direction at crest.. none of the books i have shows that.. anyways one always tends to be protective about his point in a discussion..

 

[plantaholic]

lol. . i thought it was 2

it was just one mark

 

[MustafaMotani]

its good to be like this, isnt it?

well yEah its good to be like That no tension for d paper until its really there
but I cant study even if I try before exams are on head..

 

[MustafaMotani]

for those who might not have surfed whole thread..

 

[asad.manutd9]

well yEah its good to be like That no tension for d paper until its really there
but I cant study even if I try before exams are on head..

i m on pc for like 13 hours now didnt study a word gonna sleep in like 15 mins, get up, and read first 18 chapters of chemistry in 5-6 hours, and yes, i can do that! lol

 

[MustafaMotani]

i m on pc for like 13 hours now didnt study a word gonna sleep in like 15 mins, get up, and read first 18 chapters of chemistry in 5-6 hours, and yes, i can do that! lol

Its not like I cant do it..
I also have alot of pratice

 

[asad.manutd9]

Its not like I cant do it..
I also have alot of pratice

haha glad to know.!

 

[amantha]

What question. Do u want to answer ....I don't hve any doubts

In da paper1 the last question, about the half life thing, wats the answer, is it 4 minutes?
In paper 2 section A we had to draw field lines from the spheres, so is it frm positive to negative

 

[ashiqbal]

ok so you are saying that it will move up. k i get it. you are saying that the particle will move upper than its max displacemnt?

do you understand a word i am saying? i am saying that it is momentarily at REST , so at that particular movement, it is NOT MOVING!

u r being .. errr funny * wont use the word stupid *

feel free to use it, if u mean it! better to let it out than hold a grudge, dont you think, eh? and anyway, i understand that what you are trying to say is that the movement of the particle at the next instant would be downwards, right? but if it was not mentioned about the movement of the particle at next instant, then couldnt it be movement of particle at the previous instant as well, which was upward? I hope that yours is right, not fighting or anything, but just expressing the facts as they are!

true k its just some random blog.. but its the only place where ive seen particle movement direction at crest.. none of the books i have shows that.. anyways one always tends to be protective about his point in a discussion..

well said!

throw some water on the heat will you... its nothing to fight for I made same arrow (upward) thinking that currently it was moving upwards so current force would be upwards, question saide "draw the arrow showing the direction of force actiong on particle X" or somethng like that..

ok ok! but the question said "draw an arrow on fig 6.1 to show the direction of movement of particle at X", and even if it was force, if a particle is at rest, there is no resultant force acting on it!

 

[ashiqbal]

In da paper1 the last question, about the half life thing, wats the answer, is it 4 minutes?
In paper 2 section A we had to draw field lines from the spheres, so is it frm positive to negative

yes, both are correct!

 

[asad.manutd9]

do you understand a word i am saying? i am saying that it is momentarily at REST , so at that particular movement, it is NOT MOVING!

feel free to use it, if u mean it! better to let it out than hold a grudge, dont you think, eh? and anyway, i understand that what you are trying to say is that the movement of the particle at the next instant would be downwards, right? but if it was not mentioned about the movement of the particle at next instant, then couldnt it be movement of particle at the previous instant as well, which was upward? I hope that yours is right, not fighting or anything, but just expressing the facts as they are!

well said!


ok ok! but the question said "draw an arrow on fig 6.1 to show the direction of movement of particle at X", and even if it was force, if a particle is at rest, there is no resultant force acting on it!

just kidding m8 what i think is if they meant that particle is at rest, they just cant ask us to point it out by an arrow, as i dont know any arrow which represents rest, just an opinion

 

[amantha]

yes, both are correct!

thanks,,
For da section B radioactivity question from where does da background radiation come?? Any answers?

 

[asad.manutd9]

thanks,,
For da section B radioactivity question from where does da background radiation come?? Any answers?

i left it answered :'(

 

[ashiqbal]

just kidding m8 what i think is if they meant that particle is at rest, they just cant ask us to point it out by an arrow, as i dont know any arrow which represents rest, just an opinion

mine was just and opinion too yar! no hard feelings!

 

[ashiqbal]

thanks,,
For da section B radioactivity question from where does da background radiation come?? Any answers?

cosmic rays, underground rock(granite), from un-safley deposited nuclear waste, from nuclear reactions near power plants!

 

[MustafaMotani]

ok ok! but the question said "draw an arrow on fig 6.1 to show the direction of movement of particle at X", and even if it was force, if a particle is at rest, there is no resultant force acting on it!

Got it