We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)
Yeah, didn't read the question properly. :\ Thanks.well, here, you have to answer in reference to the graph, not by interpreting from the equation. you can see that in the graph, as V increases beyond 1.6 the power dissipation decreases.
Any help would be really appreciated Part B, C(i)(iv)
View attachment 10897
View attachment 10899
View attachment 10900
When I was doing this paper as revision:http://www.xtremepapers.com/papers/CIE/Cambridge International A and AS Level/Physics (9702)/9702_s10_qp_21.pdf
I noticed question 5.b)ii) does not have an answer on the mark scheme, so can anyone tell me the answer?
any1???....http://www.xtremepapers.com/papers/...and AS Level/Physics (9702)/9702_s03_qp_2.pdf
Q4a(ii)
why the maximum brightness decreases and seperaation increases in 1 n 2???
you will just divde 1m/5.8*10^5 and the answer is 1.72*10^-6 because there are 5.8*10^5 lines in 1 meterany1???....
also have problem in http://www.xtremepapers.com/papers/CIE/Cambridge International A and AS Level/Physics (9702)/9702_w03_qp_2.pdf
Q4b ....how to find the spacing of the lines of the grating???...
yes you r right the field lines are getting toward the sphereActually, D can't be labeled to the right if the metal plate, because the field lines are getting closer, so the strength of the field is increasing.
ci) For the stationary wave the particles between two consecutive nodes or 2 consecutive antinodes vibrate in the same phase. therefore, they have no phase difference between them. the answer will be 0.
iv) the wave will be a straight horizontal line over the dotted line. For a stationary wave there is no onward motion of disturbance from one particle to the adjoining particle, so beyond a particular instant of time the displacement of all the particles is 0.
a1) the diagram is below. for a wave s = f x lamda, therefore s = (1/T) x lamda so, lamda = s x T
the speed is same for both the first and the second wave, as T changes by .25 the wavelength also shifts by .25, which is 20cm here. thus the second wave will be 20 cm to the right of the first.
View attachment 10909please answer the question with explanation
Oh ok gt it TnxNo, it wouldn't. for the wave to have a phase difference if 180* the difference between them has to be 1/2 the wavelength. here, it if were a moving wave the phase difference would be approx. 45* that is 1/8 the wavelength.
The initial wave starts from zero, and by then the second wave has already traveled 1/4 of the wavelength, that is 20m. So, it starts from 20.
http://www.xtremepapers.com/papers/CIE/Cambridge International A and AS Level/Physics (9702)/9702_s07_qp_2.pdf
need help in question 6 part (a) (ii) Why are we using total emf here? Its only asking about the battery ...... am confused
For almost 10 years, the site XtremePapers has been trying very hard to serve its users.
However, we are now struggling to cover its operational costs due to unforeseen circumstances. If we helped you in any way, kindly contribute and be the part of this effort. No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
Click here to Donate Now