• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

Physics: Post your doubts here!

Messages
263
Reaction score
746
Points
103
ci) For the stationary wave the particles between two consecutive nodes or 2 consecutive antinodes vibrate in the same phase. therefore, they have no phase difference between them. the answer will be 0.

iv) the wave will be a straight horizontal line over the dotted line. For a stationary wave there is no onward motion of disturbance from one particle to the adjoining particle, so beyond a particular instant of time the displacement of all the particles is 0.

a1) the diagram is below. for a wave s = f x lamda, therefore s = (1/T) x lamda so, lamda = s x T
the speed is same for both the first and the second wave, as T changes by .25 the wavelength also shifts by .25, which is 20cm here. thus the second wave will be 20 cm to the right of the first.

Oh okay so if it wasnt a stationary wave then it wud be 180* right?

For a1 I got it but how does it start from 20?
 
Messages
263
Reaction score
746
Points
103
No, it wouldn't. for the wave to have a phase difference if 180* the difference between them has to be 1/2 the wavelength. here, it if were a moving wave the phase difference would be approx. 45* that is 1/8 the wavelength.

The initial wave starts from zero, and by then the second wave has already traveled 1/4 of the wavelength, that is 20m. So, it starts from 20.
Oh ok gt it:) Tnx :)
 
Messages
33
Reaction score
13
Points
8
q(7) b......in the ms and er it says for damage of supply to take place lamp A must be shorted ....why especially lamp A wasnt lamp c da shorted one in the quetion b4 it??? any 1 plzz thx in adv
 

Attachments

  • 9702_s06_qp_2.pdf
    224.3 KB · Views: 8
Messages
33
Reaction score
13
Points
8
its easy if u understand (a)i.2 to get the total emf of the circuit we would add the emf of battery nd charger but as they have opposite polarity it would be the emf of charger minus that of battery bec normally charger has higher emf so its 14-E now for (ii) the V=IR u will substitute 14-E for V and equate it so that 14-E=42x0.16 and solve for E :Dhope i didnt confuse u
 
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Points
11
Hi all, i was just wondering if alternate currents come up in the aslevel exam?? cause on the syllabus it says its for alevel, but our teacher taught it to us this year, so im confused where to study it or not? help please
 
Messages
33
Reaction score
13
Points
8
Hi all, i was just wondering if alternate currents come up in the aslevel exam?? cause on the syllabus it says its for alevel, but our teacher taught it to us this year, so im confused where to study it or not? help please
nop its not in da as level my teacher never explained it nd dere r no questions about in da pastpapers
 
Messages
29
Reaction score
2
Points
13
PLEASE someone help me with the potential divider ,,,,,, please post any examples based on it ....
and please tell how do we solve q5b may june 2010 paper 21 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 

Jaf

Messages
321
Reaction score
232
Points
53
make a horizontal vector and a vertical vector by working out the vertical velocity and these will be 90 degrees to each other and simply use pythagoras theorem to find the resultant =)
Uh... the resultant velocity is 25 (given in part b)).
So you have to take an appropriate scale and draw in the horizontal first. Then draw a vertical from the end of the horizontal (at 90 degrees). Then start the resultant from the other end of the horizontal and join this to the vertical where the resultant is equal to 25 (from your scale). Then rub out the vertical and measure the angle between the horizontal and resultant velocities.
 
Messages
869
Reaction score
374
Points
73
Uh... the resultant velocity is 25 (given in part b)).
So you have to take an appropriate scale and draw in the horizontal first. Then draw a vertical from the end of the horizontal (at 90 degrees). Then start the resultant from the other end of the horizontal and join this to the vertical where the resultant is equal to 25 (from your scale). Then rub out the vertical and measure the angle between the horizontal and resultant velocities.
isnt the vertical velocity is the one equal to 25ms^-1 ?
 

Jaf

Messages
321
Reaction score
232
Points
53
isnt the vertical velocity is the one equal to 25ms^-1 ?
Nope, doesn't fit in.

If we calculate the time taken for the ball to reach the ground using the vertical velocity:
s=ut+(gt²)/2
Since u=0, this gives us t= 1.81 seconds (s=16, g=9.8)

Now if you put in the values in v=u+at:
v = 9.8 * 1.81 = 17.7 ms⁻¹ ≠ 25 ms⁻¹

But √(17.7² + 18²) ≈ 25 ms⁻¹!
:D
 
Top