thanks a lot can you solve these13,16,25,31
We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)
thanks a lot can you solve these13,16,25,31
7. idk really.please solve these 3 question
13. A, because you have to consider the weight of the ruler which is 50N as it is a uniform ruler it must act at 1.5 ( half 3) which is 0.5 from the pivot 0.5x50=1xW (clockwise moment=anti-clockwise moment) W=25N13,16,25,31
Yeah.. that is possible. Ur welcome!Aaaahhh, now i get it.. Thank you so muchh!! But what if we have constant velocity increase in a VELOCITY-TIME GRAPH, can we use the formula (a=v-u/t)?
13. A, because you have to consider the weight of the ruler which is 50N as it is a uniform ruler it must act at 1.5 ( half 3) which is 0.5 from the pivot 0.5x50=1xW (clockwise moment=anti-clockwise moment) W=25N
16. B, as there is no loss of energy to the surroundings as heat as there is no air resistance, the total energy of the ball will be constant.
25. A, always when u do this question move in the opposite direction to the energy travel, u will find that if u moved this way P will move downwards but as Q is maximum it will stay stationary (also for ur information minimum point stays stationary as well)
31.D, R is inversely proportional to d^2 so if u double d u will quarter the resistance at P, but as the question wants in terms of current then it will be 4 at P (as R is incersely proportional to current)[/quote
thanks fr the help bro but cn u explain 25 elaborately
..m1u1 + m2u2 = ( m1 + m2) v so Y is satationary so u = o so , mu/2m = v so v is 1/2 so the kinetic energy is also halfed so CHela:
for question 7 it might be because at first the total kinetic energy is 1/2 mv^2 and after that we have double the mass which mean kinetic energy is mv^2
as Ek= 1/2mv^2 then mv^2=2Ek then as we have two masses the kinetic energy is spread on both of them so 2Ek/2 will give Ek each and so there is no change in kinetic energy.
NOTE: imnot sure about the way i got the answer, i dont think it is correct.
OH BUddy ur great.nw i got it.ur really genius
no actually the answer is A for this question, i check the mark scheme...m1u1 + m2u2 = ( m1 + m2) v so Y is satationary so u = o so , mu/2m = v so v is 1/2 so the kinetic energy is also halfed so C
ur frm which country?u have a cute avatarHaha, Gracias. Happy to help
buddy the answer is c.check the markscheme carefully.we;; how the change in kinetic energy would be 0 for an inelastic collison?it should be cno actually the answer is A for this question, i check the mark scheme.
anyway for Q.25 direction of energy travel is to the right so you move across the wave in the opposite direction which is to the left, then if u find that your finger goes down when u go across the wave at P, then it will move downwards. i find it very hard to explain how to answer the question, thats the best i can do.
ok i think i saw a different mark scheme, it all makes sense now i tried to find an explanation for why it is A and i came up with a stupid explanation. ty for pointing it out.buddy the answer is c.check the markscheme carefully.we;; how the change in kinetic energy would be 0 for an inelastic collison?it should be c
cn u help me to solve mj 06 question 9.i face problems in this type of question.cn u draw itHaha, Gracias. Happy to help
cn u help me to solve mj 06 question 9.i face problems in this type of question.cn u draw it
m nt getting it.i dnt understand these questions.same question in mj07 p1 23.pls cn any1 clear the concept by drawing it?
For almost 10 years, the site XtremePapers has been trying very hard to serve its users.
However, we are now struggling to cover its operational costs due to unforeseen circumstances. If we helped you in any way, kindly contribute and be the part of this effort. No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
Click here to Donate Now