• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

Physics: Post your doubts here!

Messages
1,258
Reaction score
1,397
Points
173

Calculate the resistance of the heater first. P = V^2/R R = 52.9 ohm

i) Voltage across both the resistors would be 230. Use V^2/R = 2000W

ii)Voltage would be equally distributed across both the heaters. = 500W

iii) Calculate the parallel resistance of the circuit. 1/52.9 + 1/52.9 = 26.45. The third resistor is in series. Voltage dissipated across it would be 52.9/52.9 + 26.45 * 230 = 460/3 Volts. The rest 230/3V would be dissipated across both the other resistors.
Use V^2/R = 666.6 = 667 W
 
Messages
567
Reaction score
553
Points
103
Calculate the resistance of the heater first. P = V^2/R R = 52.9 ohm

i) Voltage across both the resistors would be 230. Use V^2/R = 2000W

ii)Voltage would be equally distributed across both the heaters. = 500W

iii) Calculate the parallel resistance of the circuit. 1/52.9 + 1/52.9 = 26.45. The third resistor is in series. Voltage dissipated across it would be 52.9/52.9 + 26.45 * 230 = 460/3 Volts. The rest 230/3V would be dissipated across both the other resistors.
Use V^2/R = 666.6 = 667 W
But in the first part when we use V^2/R we get 1000W not 2000W
 
Messages
528
Reaction score
1,241
Points
153
Guys..
If anyone has an easy method .. Or the changes to X and all when the intensity increases ...
To remember or written as they are asked in the pastpapers .. Like what happens to the dark fringes etc..
Please share or if made any notes PLEASE SHARE!! I'm really bad at that thing ... :(


Help would be well appreciated .. Thank u :)
 
Messages
26
Reaction score
39
Points
23
Oct/Nov 11 paper-22 q-1(b)
Please can someone explain in details and if possible provide notes for these graph type questions.
 
Messages
131
Reaction score
220
Points
43
Messages
1,258
Reaction score
1,397
Points
173
The time period of the stationary wave is 20ms. After 5 ms, it would be a straight horizontal line, drawn on the dotted line. Take a look at this animation and you will understand the logic

Standing_wave_2.gif
 
Messages
1,258
Reaction score
1,397
Points
173
In the previous part, we calculated the density of the nucleus, which is very high compared to the density of the iron ball. This means that most of the mass is concentrated at the nucleus. But as the nucleus is very small, it occupies only a small volume, and the rest of the iron ball is mostly empty space, leading to decrease in density.
 
Messages
1,258
Reaction score
1,397
Points
173
DeViL gURl B)
For the b part, while the velocity is positive, the ball is going upwards. When it is negative, it is coming downwards. Use area under the graph 1/2 (2.4) * 9 - 1/2 1.6 * 6

For c part, the safest to do this question would be to form an equation of the line and find the co-ordinates at time 3.5s. However, in the mark scheme, they have written (allow 4.2 +- 0.2) thus 4 would also be accepted
 
Messages
37
Reaction score
16
Points
18
Question! In this paper (http://papers.xtremepapers.com/CIE/...nd AS Level/Physics (9702)/9702_s12_qp_22.pdf) Q6c (ii), the answer in the marking scheme is 490 - 500 Hz. This is as a result of multiplying the distance between two consecutive antinodes or alternate nodes (which is 0.34 m) by 2 (giving 0.68 m) and taking that value as the wavelength. My question is, why do they multiply it by 2? The stationary wave produced isn't the first harmonic, so why do we multiply it by 2?
 
Messages
616
Reaction score
2,961
Points
253
Top