Can someone plz solve this question... I would really be grateful
We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)
Can someone plz solve this question... I would really be grateful
15)
The diving board is in equilibrium - it is not accelerating, it is not revolving.
If an object is not accelerating, there is no net force on the object.
If an object is not rotating, there is no net torque on the object.
The boy is stationary, so the force exerted on him by the board that holds him up is equal in magnitude to his weight. By Newton's Third Law, he exerts the same force downwards on the board. Since his weight is mg, the force he exerts on the board is equal to mg, and acts downwards. This force acts 5.0 meters away from the hinge.
The spring, if deformed by a distance "x", will exert a force of magnitude "kx" upwards on the board. This force contacts and pushes the board 2.0 meters from the hinge.
In this case, we can see that the board isn't rotating, so the net torque on it is zero. So, to find out our answer, we take moments about the hinge:
Moment due to the boy = mg * 5.0 meters = 5mg in the anti-clockwise direction.
Moment due to the spring = kx * 2.0 meters = 2kx in the clockwise direction.
So the net torque is zero, therefore 5mg = 2kx. Therefore, x = 5mg/2k
Putting in the values, we get x = 5 * 50 * 9.81/(2 * 10,000) = 1962/20000 = 0.0981 meters
This is equal to 0.0981 * 100 = 9.81 centimeters = C.
see the moment produced by the weight will be
Wait I'll come from lapy in 10 mins it's hrad it toye frm cell :/View attachment 44302
ans is D :/
why wont we consider the torque of a couple for the weight?see the moment produced by the weight will be
900x0.2=180Nm
the torque by F will be Fx1.2=180
hence F will be 150N
okWait I'll come from lapy in 10 mins it's hrad it toye frm cell :/
Look Proton Has Charge of (+)1.! We need to end Up at One Using Values of Up quark and Down Quark.!
I showed na 180 :/why wont we consider the torque of a couple for the weight?
the cord is wound around the disc so wont tension in the cord cause a couple?
but u r multiplying 900 by .2 not .4I showed na 180 :/
i didn't get it :/Look Proton Has Charge of (+)1.! We need to end Up at One Using Values of Up quark and Down Quark.!
If U Take 2 UpQuarks = (+)(2/3) * 2 = (+)(4/3)
And One Down Quark = (-)(1/3) * 1 = (-)(1/3)
When You add them Together..
(+)(4/3) + (-)(1/3)= (+)1
What you dint get in this ?i didn't get it :/
why you think its 0.4 rather than 0.2?but u r multiplying 900 by .2 not .4
wont the tension in the cord cause parallel forces on the disc causing the disc to rotate?
Since charge on proton is +ive e, the sum of both 'up quarks' and 'down quarks' should equal to 1.i didn't get it :/
B ?View attachment 44307
What does this mean? Please explain. sorry for the two posts. I couldnt remove it View attachment 44307 View attachment 44307
It is C. It seems like A,B and C all seem true
Wait ._.It is C. It seems like A,B and C all seem true
For almost 10 years, the site XtremePapers has been trying very hard to serve its users.
However, we are now struggling to cover its operational costs due to unforeseen circumstances. If we helped you in any way, kindly contribute and be the part of this effort. No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
Click here to Donate Now