- Messages
- 8,392
- Reaction score
- 9,461
- Points
- 573
I shouldn't have intervene but that urge to reply has taken over me.A. We were not arguing in the first place, if you did read the first post, it only presented an idea to implement an electoral based system for the selection of the moderation team. B. All we ask for, is you keeping a check onto your team. C. Banning someone time and again and without even telling why person is banned isn't exactly right. True, you're not bound to do any explaining regarding the ban to anyone, but seriously? Without any warnings? Nothing. And then you go like, he has to present his point of view over the issue. Mind telling us what exactly was the immediate reason for the ban in the first place, that too, with evidence?
- If you see this thread, I can't see a page in which there's no argument.
- Your suggestions were not required.
- Admin knows what to do and what not to, like i said, it's his site.
- Some reasons and issues cannot be told in public, we ban people, do you think we should post the reason for every single of them in the public?