- Messages
- 858
- Reaction score
- 1,118
- Points
- 153
Hi guys.... Anyone taking business studies, accounting, g.p???
We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)
Hi guys.... Anyone taking business studies, accounting, g.p???
having found pt of intersection P as x=1 and y=2 we can now find the distance btw p and line y=3x+7 so tht half the distance will give Q ..now the distance being said here means the perpendicular distance so we do know tht this perpendicular wud pass thru P(1,2) and tht its gradient will be -1/3 so we can find its equation by y=mx+c which gives m as -1/3 and putting in x=1 and y=2 gives c=7/3 so y= (-1x+7)/3 now finding the point of intersection of this perpendicular with the line y=3x+7 will give us the coordinates on y=3x+7 which are(-1.4,2.8) so 2 coordinates r (1,2) and (-1.4,2.8) hence midway pt= (-0.2,2.4)
But where is perpendicular stated?Or are we just to assume it?Because the given information is too vague to accurately find the answer.The line from the P point could be cutting the y=3x+7 midpoint at an angle above or below 90,so are we just to assume?having found pt of intersection P as x=1 and y=2 we can now find the distance btw p and line y=3x+7 so tht half the distance will give Q ..now the distance being said here means the perpendicular distance so we do know tht this perpendicular wud pass thru P(1,2) and tht its gradient will be -1/3 so we can find its equation by y=mx+c which gives m as -1/3 and putting in x=1 and y=2 gives c=7/3 so y= (-1x+7)/3 now finding the point of intersection of this perpendicular with the line y=3x+7 will give us the coordinates on y=3x+7 which are(-1.4,2.8) so 2 coordinates r (1,2) and (-1.4,2.8) hence midway pt= (-0.2,2.4)
the distance between the point P and the line is actually the perpendicular distance ...For instance consider the loci of a point at a fixed distance from the line (e.g AB) now the loci will be a line parallel to AB such that its distance from AB is constant and that distance is the perpendicular distance and thus talking about the distance from a line we talk about its perpendicular distance unless stated other wiseBut where is perpendicular stated?Or are we just to assume it?Because the given information is too vague to accurately find the answer.The line from the P point could be cutting the y=3x+7 midpoint at an angle above or below 90,so are we just to assume?
Why?what happened?RIP Study Group™. 2014-2014 ©
Ofcourse everybody will think theoretical and I will have to explain each and every one of them again
Alright - something to test your guys wits.
If we somehow manage to produce an unstoppable force and somehow manage to produce an immovable object and both meet/collide - who wins? You have to look at it practically, not theoretically. As such, you can assume this happens in any location of this world. Do you think it'll be a stalemate or one side will win? Both forces are equal is size, weight, magnitude etc.
F.Z.M. 7 thinks one will win, depends on circumstances which wins. I believe it'll be a stalemate, as there is a place in this world (might be artificial) where there is no net force or any external factors to trouble both forces.
What do you think? :3
Dark Destination M.Omar Kamihus FLRNAB Awesome12 ***amd*** funky brat asadalam exploded diper Tag whoever I missed.
can the object break ..or something then thne object wil lose and force continues .......
but if not then i guess one will win someday .....maybe the unstoppable object(if there is such thing)will change its angle after colliding
Oooooorrrrrrr they will pass right through each other
how can there be an immovable object and an unstoppable force.How can two solid objects pass right through each other?
how can there be an immovable object and an unstoppable force.
if i can imagine that than i can also imagine them passing thru each other ..... heheheheheYou imagine two mythical forces, doesn't mean you change how things work.
yeah whatever .. but i think one is gona win .... maybe the force will erode the object and keep on going ....Lel. Tagging you here was a travesty.
Assuming the force is infinite,and the mass is infinite,then F=ma so Infinity/Infinity =1 so acceleration would be 1 and force would winAlright - something to test your guys wits.
If we somehow manage to produce an unstoppable force and somehow manage to produce an immovable object and both meet/collide - who wins? You have to look at it practically, not theoretically. As such, you can assume this happens in any location of this world. Do you think it'll be a stalemate or one side will win? Both forces are equal is size, weight, magnitude etc.
F.Z.M. 7 thinks one will win, depends on circumstances which wins. I believe it'll be a stalemate, as there is a place in this world (might be artificial) where there is no net force or any external factors to trouble both forces.
What do you think? :3
Dark Destination M.Omar Kamihus FLRNAB Awesome12 ***amd*** funky brat asadalam exploded diper Tag whoever I missed.
For almost 10 years, the site XtremePapers has been trying very hard to serve its users.
However, we are now struggling to cover its operational costs due to unforeseen circumstances. If we helped you in any way, kindly contribute and be the part of this effort. No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
Click here to Donate Now