• We need your support!

    We are currently struggling to cover the operational costs of Xtremepapers, as a result we might have to shut this website down. Please donate if we have helped you and help make a difference in other students' lives!
    Click here to Donate Now (View Announcement)

Physics: Post your doubts here!

Messages
528
Reaction score
1,241
Points
153
Hmm..! Yo Just have to Know when Light Entering Increases i.e Slit width Increases.. This Causes Brighter Fringes to Become Brighter..!
Baqi U need to Know the Equation Lambda=a*x/D! Now when ever they Change Something for E.g change a then rearrange the Equation To make A subject! Then u can use Propationality To see wht happen to Rest of the Thins..! Bas its simple! :)
This is What i Do :p!
Thanks a lot!
Second method even I do that .. And what is the link with the intensity ? As in when u inc the intensity then what happens?
Btw thanks again :)
 
Messages
1,983
Reaction score
3,044
Points
273
http://papers.xtremepapers.com/CIE/Cambridge International A and AS Level/Physics (9702)/9702_s13_qp_21.pdf
Q3bii
i found v using v^2=u^2 +2as and then found the k.e using 1/2 mv^2 it was the same answer as ms but not the way would i get all the marks?
yes you will get all the marks if your method is correct. examiner on physics don't tell all the methods like examiner fo M1 papers. but your method just gives the correct answer by chance.

change in K = g.p.e + W.D againt air resistance
w.d against air resistance = asnwer to first part - mgh
maybe they way you did is wrong but the correct asnwer is a coincidence
 
Messages
1,764
Reaction score
3,472
Points
273
yes you will get all the marks if your method is correct. examiner on physics don't tell all the methods like examiner fo M1 papers. but your method just gives the correct answer by chance.

change in K = g.p.e + W.D againt air resistance
w.d against air resistance = asnwer to first part - mgh
maybe they way you did is wrong but the correct asnwer is a coincidence
Thanks :) My way was a different one how do i know my way is wrong :(
 
Messages
567
Reaction score
553
Points
103
I too don't have that book I studied from a cie endorsed book by Chris mee ,mike crundell,Brian Arnold and Wendy brown
 
Messages
515
Reaction score
1,447
Points
153
Thanks a lot!
Second method even I do that .. And what is the link with the intensity ? As in when u inc the intensity then what happens?
Btw thanks again :)
when amplitude is doubled then intensity increases 4 times... n when the distance frm the source is doubled then intensity decreases by 4 times...
because intensity is directly proportional to (amplitude)^2 and it is inversely proportional to (1/distance frm the source)^2
 
Messages
3,225
Reaction score
15,036
Points
523
We'll I don't have the book.. So could u please share a screen shot .. :)
Sorry if I'm bothering u a lot!
I don't have that book could you take a pic and attach it over here or inbox me
Sorry if I am asking you a bit too much

I cant right now. But please send me a Pm so I could send u later this night,but Dw i will do send it
 
Messages
398
Reaction score
761
Points
73
when amplitude is doubled then intensity increases 4 times... n when the distance frm the source is doubled then intensity decreases by 4 times...
because intensity is directly proportional to (amplitude)^2 and it is inversely proportional to (1/distance frm the source)^2
Wah Wah..! :p :p
Scientific Method :p! :)
 
Top